Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing.

The ideomotor principle predicts that the anticipation of expected sensory consequences precedes and controls voluntary goal-directed movements. Recent studies have revealed that an ideomotor mechanism could also support the link between finger movements and number processing. However, it is unknown whether such a mechanism is devoted to number processing per se, that is, without associated movement. In three experiments, we tested whether the ideomotor mechanism was also involved in a verbal number production task without associated goal-directed and motor dimensions. We tested this hypothesis in a response-effect (R-E) paradigm generally used to assess the ideomotor mechanisms. The results of Experiment 1 revealed a compatibility effect both in a stimulus-response task and an R-E task, suggesting the involvement of an ideomotor mechanism during number processing. More importantly, Experiment 2 revealed that performance in a motor imagery task correlated with the R-E compatibility effect, whereas performance in a visual imagery task did not, suggesting a distinct motor imagery contribution to R-E compatibility. Finally, Experiment 3 showed a strong R-E compatibility effect in a verbal word production task, but the correlations with motor or visual imagery tasks were not observed. Altogether, these findings suggest that ideomotor mechanisms play a specific and functional role in number processing.

[1]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  I. Koch,et al.  Verbal response-effect compatibility , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[7]  Michael Andres,et al.  Let us redeploy attention to sensorimotor experience , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Corrina Maguinness,et al.  Differing roles for the dominant and non-dominant hands in the hand laterality task , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Two Modes of Sensorimotor Integration in Intention-Based and Stimulus-Based Actions , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Anticipated Action Effects Affect the Selection, Initiation, and Execution of Actions , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  I. M. Harris,et al.  Selective right parietal lobe activation during mental rotation: a parametric PET study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  W. Kunde,et al.  Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Creating number semantics through finger movement perception , 2010, Cognition.

[14]  M. Thioux,et al.  Neuroanatomical Substrates of Arabic Number Processing, Numerical Comparison, and Simple Addition: A PET Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  T. Raij Patterns of Brain Activity during Visual Imagery of Letters , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Haggard Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping , 2008, Cortex.

[18]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Implicit transfer of motor strategies in mental rotation , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  B. Hommel,et al.  Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning , 2004, Psychological research.

[20]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[21]  P. Keller,et al.  Action Planning in Sequential Skills: Relations to Music Performance , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Goal Representation in Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  B. Butterworth,et al.  A Head for Figures , 1999, Science.

[24]  Michael Andres,et al.  Number magnitude potentiates action judgements , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[26]  P. Maruff,et al.  The link between motor impairment level and motor imagery ability in children with developmental coordination disorder. , 2008, Human movement science.

[27]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[28]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[29]  P. Sachdev,et al.  Differential Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Left and Right Posterior Parietal Cortex on Mental Rotation Tasks , 2006, Cortex.

[30]  Michael Andres,et al.  Actions, Words, and Numbers , 2008 .

[31]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  L. Parsons Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[34]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli , 2006 .

[35]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  The role of the preSMA and the rostral cingulate zone in internally selected actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[36]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  A. Kiesel,et al.  Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[38]  M. Corballis,et al.  The roles of stimulus-response compatibility and mental rotation in mirror-image and left-right decisions. , 1996, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[39]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Getting a grip on numbers: numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Denise H. Wu,et al.  The common magnitude code underlying numerical and size processing for action but not for perception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Etienne Olivier,et al.  Response–effect compatibility of finger–numeral configurations in arithmetical context , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Finger-number interaction: an ideomotor account. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[43]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral activations during number multiplication and comparison: a PET study , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[46]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[47]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control , 2001 .

[48]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .