Detection and discrimination of small, brief lights: Variable tuning of opponent channels

There is disagreement as to how closely the properties of the pathways that detect small spots resemble the properties of the achromatic system. Spectral sensitivities for small, brief lights show a single, relatively broadband peak similar to the achromatic spectral sensitivity. The lights also appear relatively desaturated near threshold. However, recent field sensitivity data (Finkelstein and Hood, 1981, 1982) have shown that opponent mechanisms are either directly involved in detecting small spots, or they interact with, and desensitize mechanisms are either directly involved in detecting small spots, or they interact with, and desensitize, a strictly achromatic detection pathway. The test sensitivity, test mixture, and wavelength discrimination data of the present study support the first alternative; they implicate opponent (chromatic) mechanisms in the detection of small, brief lights. However, the data cannot be fit by the same opponent systems used to fit large-test data. They suggest instead an hypothesis in which large and small lights are detected by opponent mechanisms that change their spectral tuning with changes in stimulus parameters.

[1]  L M Hurvich,et al.  Color vision and color coding. , 1970, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[2]  D. Hood,et al.  Cone system saturation: More than one stage of sensitivity loss , 1981, Vision Research.

[3]  S. L. Guth Nonadditivity and inhibition among chromatic luminances at threshold. , 1967, Vision research.

[4]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Luminance and opponent-color contributions to visual detection and adaptation and to temporal and spatial integration. , 1976, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  R. Massof,et al.  Vector model for normal and dichromatic color vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  D. Hood,et al.  Interactions between rod and cone channels above threshold: A test of various models , 1982, Vision Research.

[7]  B. Wandell,et al.  Detection of long-duration, long-wavelength incremental flashes by a chromatically coded pathway , 1980, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Jameson,et al.  An opponent-process theory of color vision. , 1957, Psychological review.

[9]  M. Ikeda,et al.  Rod-cone interrelation. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  B. Wandell,et al.  Detection/discrimination in the long-wavelength pathways , 1982, Vision Research.

[11]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Discrimination of simple and complex gratings , 1975, Vision Research.

[12]  C. R. Ingling,et al.  Orthogonal combination of the three visual channels , 1977, Vision Research.

[13]  S. L. Guth,et al.  Heterochromatic additivity, foveal spectral sensitivity, and a new color model. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Red-Green Cone Interactions in the Increment-Threshold Spectral Sensitivity of Primates , 1971, Science.

[15]  J. F. Bird,et al.  A general zone theory of color and brightness vision. I. Basic formulation. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Color naming of small foveal fields. , 1970, Vision research.

[17]  C F Stromeyer,et al.  Detection of red and green flashes: evidence for cancellation and facilitation. , 1978, Sensory processes.

[18]  D. Hood,et al.  Opponent-color cells can influence detection of small, brief lights , 1982, Vision Research.