T1 difficulty affects the AB: manipulating T1 word frequency and T1 orthographic neighbor frequency

Colored target words were presented with distractor nonwords in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. In Experiment 1, the attentional blink (AB) effect on T2 accuracy was larger when T1 was a difficult (low-frequency) word than when it was a high-frequency word. In Experiment 2 the effect of T1 frequency on the AB was replicated in a between-participants design, and the frequency of T1’s one-letter different neighbors (e.g., case, bare, for care) interacted with T1 frequency in its effects on T2 accuracy. Experiment 3 confirmed the effect of T1 frequency over 6 T1-T2 lags. The effects of T1 characteristics were sensitively assessed in the AB and were more consistent with resource depletion theories than control-process accounts.

[1]  Pierre Jolickur.  Concurrent Response-Selection Demands Modulate the Attentional Blink , 1999 .

[2]  M. Potter,et al.  Unmasking the attentional blink. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[4]  Troy A W Visser,et al.  When similarity leads to sparing: probing mechanisms underlying the attentional blink , 2009, Psychological research.

[5]  Sander Martens,et al.  Blinks of the mind: memory effects of attentional processes. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  W S Maki,et al.  Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentation: perceptual interference and retrieval competition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  R W Remington,et al.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  J. Raymond,et al.  Selective Visual Attention and Motivation , 2009, Psychological science.

[10]  W. Maki,et al.  Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  S. Mathey.  L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits. , 2001 .

[12]  C. A. Becker.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Enns,et al.  The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? , 2005, Psychological research.

[14]  V. Lollo,et al.  Low-level masking in the attentional blink , 1997 .

[15]  David A. Balota,et al.  Mental Chronometry: Beyond Reaction Time , 1991 .

[16]  S. L. Ehrenreich,et al.  Structure and Search of the Internal Lexicon. , 1979 .

[17]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  C M Herdman,et al.  Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  P. Jolicoeur.  Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  M. Nieuwenstein,et al.  The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: sparing at a cost. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Some further data concerning the word frequency effect , 1975 .

[23]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[24]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[25]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Orthographic neighbourhood effects in parallel distributed processing models. , 1999 .

[26]  J. Duncan,et al.  Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  Testing the counter model for perceptual identification: Effects of repetition priming and word frequency , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Jennifer S. Burt,et al.  Does a reading lexicon provide orthographic representations for spelling , 2002 .

[30]  P. Jolicoeur.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[32]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[33]  S. Andrews.  The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[34]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[35]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  T. L. Taylor,et al.  Category effects in temporal visual search , 1997 .

[37]  V. Lollo,et al.  The attentional blink is governed by a temporary loss of control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. , 2012 .

[40]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[42]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[45]  Troy A W Visser,et al.  Masking T1 difficulty: processing time and the attenional blink. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Karen M. Arnell,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  C. Olivers,et al.  A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. , 2008, Psychological review.