Hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data: A laboratory sandbox study

[1] Hydraulic tomography (HT) is a new technology that images the hydraulic heterogeneity of the subsurface. Unlike steady state hydraulic tomography (SSHT), which provides a hydraulic conductivity (K) tomogram, transient hydraulic tomography (THT) provides reliable tomograms of both K and specific storage (Ss). Effective as it may be, THT is a computationally demanding technique. To ease the computational burden, a HT which utilizes zeroth and first temporal moments of transient drawdown recovery data (HT-m) has been developed by Zhu and Yeh (2006). This procedure simplifies the governing equation from a single parabolic equation to two Poisson's equations for the zeroth moment and characteristic time defined as the ratio between the first and zeroth moments. The approach was previously tested using synthetic simulations. The numerical experiments tested the feasibility of HT-m under ideal conditions, where measurements and model are assumed to be free of error. In this paper, we further evaluate the performance of HT-m using cross-hole pumping tests conducted in a heterogeneous, synthetic aquifer constructed in a laboratory sandbox in more realistic situations, where the data used in the inversion are not free of experimental errors. Unlike field tests, the laboratory tests were conducted in a synthetic aquifer created with a prescribed heterogeneity pattern and all forcing functions (initial and boundary conditions and source-sink terms) controlled. Results from the HT-m approach were compared to those from THT previously conducted by Liu et al. (2007). Our results show that the estimation of the K tomogram using the HT-m approach is reasonable, but the estimation of the Ss tomogram is unreliable in comparison to the THT approach.

[1]  W. Nowak,et al.  Geostatistical inverse modeling of transient pumping tests using temporal moments of drawdown , 2005 .

[2]  Walter A Illman,et al.  Practical Issues in Imaging Hydraulic Conductivity through Hydraulic Tomography , 2008, Ground water.

[3]  Shuyun Liu,et al.  Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: Sandbox experiments , 2001 .

[4]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  An interactive Bayesian geostatistical inverse protocol for hydraulic tomography , 2006 .

[5]  Geoffrey C. Bohling,et al.  A field assessment of the value of steady shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2007 .

[6]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Sequential aquifer tests at a well field, Montalto Uffugo Scalo, Italy , 2007 .

[7]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  Identification of the permeability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography , 1995 .

[8]  Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al.  Characterization of aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography , 2004 .

[9]  J. Xiang Stochastic Estimation of Hydraulic Spatial Properties , 2007 .

[10]  Alex Hagen,et al.  Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Laboratory sandbox validation of transient hydraulic tomography , 2007 .

[12]  Wei Li,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Geostatistical Inversion of Flowmeter and Pumping Test Data , 2008, Ground water.

[13]  P. Choi,et al.  Denoising of gamma-ray signals by interval-dependent thresholds of wavelet analysis , 2006 .

[14]  T. Yeh,et al.  Analysis of hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data , 2006 .

[15]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach , 2003 .

[16]  James J. Butler,et al.  Steady shape analysis of tomographic pumping tests for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2002 .

[17]  T. Yeh,et al.  Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method , 2000 .

[18]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  Mapping Hydraulic Conductivity: Sequential Conditioning with Measurements of Solute Arrival Time, Hydraulic Head, and Local Conductivity , 1995 .

[19]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms , 2007 .