Assessing DTI data quality using bootstrap analysis

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an established method for characterizing and quantifying ultrastructural brain tissue properties. However, DTI‐derived variables are affected by various sources of signal uncertainty. The goal of this study was to establish an objective quality measure for DTI based on the nonparametric bootstrap methodology. The confidence intervals (CIs) of white matter (WM) fractional anisotropy (FA) and Clinear were determined by bootstrap analysis and submitted to histogram analysis. The effects of artificial noising and edge‐preserving smoothing, as well as enhanced and reduced motion were studied in healthy volunteers. Gender and age effects on data quality as potential confounds in group comparison studies were analyzed. Additional noising showed a detrimental effect on the mean, peak position, and height of the respective CIs at 10% of the original background noise. Inverse changes reflected data improvement induced by edge‐preserving smoothing. Motion‐dependent impairment was also well depicted by bootstrap‐derived parameters. Moreover, there was a significant gender effect, with females displaying less dispersion (attributable to elevated SNR). In conclusion, the bootstrap procedure is a useful tool for assessing DTI data quality. It is sensitive to both noise and motion effects, and may help to exclude confounding effects in group comparisons. Magn Reson Med 52:582–589, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Clinical severity in CADASIL related to ultrastructural damage in white matter: in vivo study with diffusion tensor MRI. , 1999, Stroke.

[2]  P. Basser,et al.  Parametric and non-parametric statistical analysis of DT-MRI data. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[3]  René Westerhausen,et al.  The influence of handedness and gender on the microstructure of the human corpus callosum: a diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging study , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  P. Basser,et al.  In vivo fiber tractography using DT‐MRI data , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M Cercignani,et al.  Magnetisation transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and grey matter from patients with multiple sclerosis , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Determining and visualizing uncertainty in estimates of fiber orientation from diffusion tensor MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Iain D Wilkinson,et al.  A measure of curve fitting error for noise filtering diffusion tensor MRI data. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[8]  C. Pierpaoli,et al.  Visualizing and characterizing white matter fiber structure and architecture in the human pyramidal tract using diffusion tensor MRI. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  Klaus Hahn,et al.  Edge Preserving Regularization and Tracking for Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2001, MICCAI.

[10]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[11]  M. Bastin,et al.  A theoretical study of the effect of experimental noise on the measurement of anisotropy in diffusion imaging. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  J. Fox Bootstrapping Regression Models , 2002 .

[13]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  P. Basser,et al.  Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Haruyasu Yamada,et al.  Normal aging in the central nervous system: quantitative MR diffusion-tensor analysis , 2002, Neurobiology of Aging.

[16]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Diffusion‐tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical review , 2002 .

[17]  N G Papadakis,et al.  A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[18]  M. O’Sullivan,et al.  Activate your online subscription , 2001, Neurology.

[19]  S. Heiland,et al.  Noise correction for the exact determination of apparent diffusion coefficients at low SNR , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  J. Schnabel,et al.  Nonlinear smoothing for reduction of systematic and random errors in diffusion tensor imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Stefan Skare,et al.  A Model-Based Method for Retrospective Correction of Geometric Distortions in Diffusion-Weighted EPI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[23]  T E Conturo,et al.  Diffusion tensor fiber tracking of human brain connectivity: aquisition methods, reliability analysis and biological results , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[24]  L. Frank Characterization of anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion‐weighted MRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  S Skare,et al.  Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[26]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[27]  L. M. Auer,et al.  Fiber Tracking from DTI Using Linear State Space Models: Detectability of the Pyramidal Tract , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  Edith V. Sullivan,et al.  Equivalent disruption of regional white matter microstructure in ageing healthy men and women , 2001, Neuroreport.

[29]  S. Skare,et al.  Noise considerations in the determination of diffusion tensor anisotropy. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  G. Winkler,et al.  Noise Reduction in Images: Some Recent Edge-Preserving Methods , 1998 .

[31]  A. Anderson Theoretical analysis of the effects of noise on diffusion tensor imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.