A guide to good practice in modeling semantics for authors and referees

This opinion piece makes some suggestions about guidelines for modeling semantics that can be referred to by authors and referees. We discuss descriptions of model structures, different forms of simulation and prediction, descriptions of different sources of uncertainty in modeling practice, the language of model validation, and concepts of predictability and fitness-for-purpose. While not expecting universal agreement on these suggestions, given the loose usage of words in the literature, we hope that the discussion of the issues involved will at least give pause for thought and encourage good practice in model development and applications. Key Points Semantics of hydrological modelling lack clarity Clarifications for simulation and forecasting and treatment of uncertainty Clarifications for model evaluation and falsification

[1]  J. Freer,et al.  Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality , 2012 .

[2]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Theoretical derivation of Darcy's law , 1977 .

[3]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Conservation equations governing hillslope responses: Exploring the physical basis of water balance , 2000 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes , 2012 .

[5]  Keith Beven,et al.  Concepts of Information Content and Likelihood in Parameter Calibration for Hydrological Simulation Models , 2014 .

[6]  Hannah L. Cloke,et al.  Evaluating forecasts of extreme events for hydrological applications: an approach for screening unfamiliar performance measures , 2008 .

[7]  Keith Beven,et al.  Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework , 2007 .

[8]  Maarten S. Krol,et al.  Identification and classification of uncertainties in the application of environmental models , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Keith Beven,et al.  On red herrings and real herrings: disinformation and information in hydrological inference , 2011 .

[10]  Peter Young,et al.  Data-based Mechanistic Modelling and Validation of Rainfall-flow Processes , 2001 .

[11]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Hydrological aspects of meteorological verification , 2008 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  On doing better hydrological science , 2008 .

[13]  K. Beven,et al.  Comment on “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?” by Jasper A. Vrugt, Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Hoshin V. Gupta and Bruce A. Robinson , 2009 .

[14]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Guest editorial: treatment of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems , 1996 .

[15]  Philip W. Gassman,et al.  The Worldwide Use of the SWAT Model: Technological Drivers, Networking Impacts, and Simulation Trends , 2010 .

[16]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Reply to comment by K. Beven et al. on “Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling” , 2012 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  Comment on “Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling” by P. Clark et al. , 2012 .

[18]  Keith Beven.  ‘Here we have a system in which liquid water is moving; let's just get at the physics of it’ (Penman 1965) , 2014 .

[19]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Top‐down and data‐based mechanistic modelling of rainfall–flow dynamics at the catchment scale , 2003 .

[20]  Alberto Montanari,et al.  What do we mean by ‘uncertainty’? The need for a consistent wording about uncertainty assessment in hydrology , 2007 .

[21]  R. Clarke.  A review of some mathematical models used in hydrology, with observations on their calibration and use , 1973 .

[22]  J. C. Refsgaard,et al.  The role of uncertainty in climate change adaptation strategies—A Danish water management example , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[23]  J. R. Trapero,et al.  Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis. An Introduction for the Student and Practitioner, Second edition, Peter C. Young. Springer (2011), 504 pp., Hardcover, $119.00, ISBN: 978-3-642-21980-1 , 2015 .

[24]  G. Guo,et al.  Reply to the comment , 1997, quant-ph/9710014.

[25]  Keith Beven,et al.  So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent , 2008 .

[26]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? , 2009 .

[27]  K. Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils , 1982 .

[28]  David J Spiegelhalter,et al.  Don't know, can't know: embracing deeper uncertainties when analysing risks , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling , 2011 .

[30]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error , 2004 .

[31]  Reinder A. Feddes,et al.  Simulation of field water uptake by plants using a soil water dependent root extraction function , 1976 .

[32]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Keith Beven,et al.  On the colour and spin of epistemic error (and what we might do about it) , 2011 .

[34]  J. Refsgaard.  Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models , 1997 .

[35]  Kerry Gallagher,et al.  Reply to comment regarding the ICE-hypothesis , 2009 .

[36]  John D. Bredehoeft,et al.  Ground-water models cannot be validated , 1992 .

[37]  W. G. Gray,et al.  Coupled equations for mass and momentum balance in a stream network: theoretical derivation and computational experiments , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[38]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  A blueprint for process‐based modeling of uncertain hydrological systems , 2012 .

[39]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Hypothetico‐inductive data‐based mechanistic modeling of hydrological systems , 2013 .

[40]  J. Kirchner.  Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology , 2006 .

[41]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[43]  Keith Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils revisited , 2013 .

[44]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Typology of hydrologic predictability , 2011 .

[45]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[46]  Mary P. Anderson,et al.  The role of the postaudit in model validation , 1992 .

[47]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  HESS Opinions "A random walk on water" , 2009 .

[48]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[49]  Keith Beven,et al.  Dalton Medal Lecture: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? , 2001 .

[50]  Edward J. Rykiel,et al.  Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation , 1996 .

[51]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[52]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[53]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Modelling guidelinesterminology and guiding principles , 2004 .

[54]  J. Refsgaard,et al.  Operational Validation and Intercomparison of Different Types of Hydrological Models , 1996 .