The importance of teacher's presence and engagement in MOOC learning environment: A case study

MOOC has progressively obtained its popularity in the past few years and it showed a big movement in higher education in Malaysia. With the emergence of MOOCs, the educational world is becoming flat and classrooms can now be borderless. The main objective for this study is to explore the learning process and perception of students in using MOOC as part of their module and to identify issues faced when using MOOC. The researchers are also interested to find the importance of teacher's presence in the MOOC environment. The 4-stage online presence (4-SOP) model was used as a theoretical framework to develop the focus group question and as an explorative investigation to student's acceptance of learning in a MOOC. A follow up research using questionnaire was used to investigate student's perceptions of MOOC and the importance of teacher presence on the MOOC provided by the university. This study involves a total of 66 students. Results have indicated that teaching presence, training and support, interesting learning contents, consistent feedback and interaction among facilitators are crucial to sustain the engagement of students in using the online technologies. Lastly, the objectives and benefits of MOOCs should be clarified before students start to use MOOCs so that the students can achieve their learning goals easily.

[1]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Sage, guide, both, or even more? An examination of instructor activity in online MBA courses , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[3]  D. Gash E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2012 .

[4]  Martin Ebner,et al.  “How satisfied are you with your MOOC?” - A Research Study on Interaction in Huge Online Courses , 2013 .

[5]  Li Yuan,et al.  MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education , 2013 .

[6]  D. Cassidy,et al.  Keeping Them Clicking : Promoting Student Engagement in MOOC Design , 2013 .

[7]  Joanna Gerber MOOCs: Innovation, Disruption and Instructional Leadership in Higher Education , 2014 .

[8]  Richard J. Self,et al.  4-stage Online Presence Model: Model for Module Design and Delivery Using Web 2.0 Technologies to Facilitate Critical Thinking Skills , 2014 .

[9]  Mushtak Al-Atabi,et al.  Teaching entrepreneurship using Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) , 2014 .

[10]  Rose Alinda Alias,et al.  STAKEHOLDERS' VIEW ON MOOCS SUSTAINABILITY IN MALAYSIAN HIGHER EDUCATION: A PRELIMINARY STUDY , 2015 .

[11]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Learning from MOOCs: a qualitative case study from the learners’ perspectives , 2015 .

[13]  Catalina Ulrich,et al.  MOOCs in Our University: Hopes and Worries☆ , 2015 .

[14]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  A Usability Evaluation of a Blended MOOC Environment: An Experimental Case Study. , 2015 .

[15]  Rachel B. Baker,et al.  Persistence Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015 .

[16]  Helmi Norman,et al.  Factors for Development of Learning Content and Task for MOOCs in an Asian Context , 2016 .

[17]  Wong Seng Yue,et al.  Exploring Factors Affecting Learners' Acceptance of MOOCs Based on Kirkpatrick's Model , 2017, IC4E '17.

[18]  Wilfried Admiraal,et al.  Students' Learning Outcomes in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Some Suggestions for Course Design , 2017 .

[19]  Lim Chee Leong,et al.  Developing a Pedagogy Framework for Institution-Wide Implementation of MOOC: A Case Study from a Malaysian Private University , 2017 .