Multi-criteria decision methodology for selecting maintenance key performance indicators

Many key performance indicators (KPIs) can be used for measuring maintenance performance. Companies must implement a suitable set of KPIs to measure the performance of maintenance services and the influence of practices implemented in their activities. Establishing a useful set of maintenance KPIs depends on a company's maintenance objectives and is highly related to specific business contexts, strategies, processes, and systems. Maintenance managers deal with the complex tasks of finding the best performance indicators that can help them to achieve goals. This paper presents a new approach to selecting relevant maintenance KPIs using a methodology based on the original ELECTRE I, which is a multi-criteria decision making method. The proposed methodology, which involves decision maker's preference information, determines a ranking of possible alternatives following its evaluation according to important criteria. To validate the methodology, a case study is presented. The results show that this methodology is an effective tool to aid maintenance managers in accurate KPI selection tasks according to maintenance objectives and strategies. The proposed methodology makes the decision process more explicit, rational, and efficient.

[1]  Hana Pacaiova,et al.  Systematic approach in maintenance management improvement , 2013 .

[2]  Liliane Pintelon,et al.  Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection , 2014 .

[3]  Nataša Bojković,et al.  One solution for cross-country transport-sustainability evaluation using a modified ELECTRE method , 2010 .

[4]  Laurent Botti,et al.  Multi-criteria ELECTRE method and destination competitiveness , 2013 .

[5]  Agus Harjoko,et al.  ELECTRE Methods in Solving Group Decision Supports System Bioinformatics on Gene Mutation Detection simulation , 2011 .

[6]  Virgilio Cruz-Machado,et al.  A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green supply chain management , 2012 .

[7]  Juscelino Almeida Dias,et al.  Electre Tri-C, a multiple criteria decision aiding sorting model applied to assisted reproduction , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[10]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions , 2013 .

[11]  Behnam Vahdani,et al.  Extension of the ELECTRE method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets , 2011, Soft Comput..

[12]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[13]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  An application of a multi‐criteria approach to assessing the performance of Portugal's economic sectors , 2005 .

[15]  Siamak Haji Yakhchali,et al.  Risk ranking of tunnel construction projects by using the ELECTRE technique under a fuzzy environment , 2013 .

[16]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A MULTI‐OBJECTIVE DECISION MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL, AND INDUSTRIAL LAND USE , 1976 .

[18]  A. Zandi,et al.  Extension of Fuzzy ELECTRE based on VIKOR method , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  A. Hatami-Marbini,et al.  An Extension of the Electre I Method for Group Decision-Making Under a Fuzzy Environment , 2011 .

[20]  Jitendra Kumar,et al.  MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE METRICS FOR MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY , 2013 .

[21]  Virgilio Cruz-Machado,et al.  Decision Methodology for Maintenance KPI Selection: Based on ELECTRE I , 2014 .

[22]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  An integrated fuzzy AHP-ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Aditya Parida,et al.  Maintenance performance metrics a state of the art review , 2013 .

[24]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[25]  T. Saaty,et al.  Why the magic number seven plus or minus two , 2003 .

[26]  Mehmet Sevkli,et al.  An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection , 2010 .

[27]  Ludo Gelders,et al.  Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators , 2011 .