Web Content Authorship: Academic Librarians in Web Content Management

An increasing number of libraries and information centers are using content management (CM) applications to develop, redesign, and maintain their websites. the purpose of this research was to provide understanding of attitudes of academic librarians about how their utilization of CM technology influences the information services they provide at the academic library’s website and to examine their perceptions of how using CM affects the creation of the web content. This research applied a qualitative research design (electronic survey and in-depth semi-structured interviews of academic subject librarians) with elements of a quantitative approach. the study discussed the concept of web authorship and supplied fundamentals for future theoretical research about authorship in web content development at academic libraries. the study provided an overview of CM at academic libraries and explored characteristics of dynamic content and semantic web applications at their websites. It discussed librarians’ opinions about issues of migration to the new content management system (CMS), factors affecting its efficient employment, and roles of librarians in web content management. Results of this study will serve to future research on management behavior of academic librarians authoring web content with the help of CM. the findings about the difficulties observed in the use of CMS and solutions, influence of training and learning, importance of cooperation and communication, adjustment of the CMS to the users’ needs, qualifications and skills needed in application of CM, distribution of responsibilities in the use of CMS, features of the CMS, and requirements to its functionality will have implications for academic and other libraries applying CM.

[1]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Quality information and knowledge , 1998 .

[2]  D. D. Vaus,et al.  Surveys in Social Research , 1991 .

[3]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[4]  Barry Trott,et al.  What Will Become of Reference in Academic and Public Libraries? , 2009 .

[5]  Elena Maceviciute,et al.  The development of the information management research area , 2002, Inf. Res..

[6]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[7]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[8]  Jonathan Warwick On the future of library operations research , 2009 .

[9]  Linda Schamber,et al.  Time-line interviews and inductive content analysis: their effectiveness for exploring cognitive behaviors , 2000 .

[10]  Jack M. Maness Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries , 2006, Webology.

[11]  Tim Wales Library subject guides: a content management case study at the Open University, UK , 2005, Program.

[12]  Oya Y. Rieger Search Engine Use Behavior of Students and Faculty: User Perceptions and Implications for Future Research , 2009, First Monday.

[13]  Holly Yu Library Web Content Management: Needs and Challenges , 2005 .

[14]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On , 2009 .

[15]  Martin P. Courtois,et al.  Was this guide helpful? Users' perceptions of subject guides , 2005 .

[16]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[17]  Beth Evans The authors of academic library home pages: their identity, training and dissemination of Web construction skills , 1999, Internet Res..

[18]  John V. Richardson,et al.  Adoption of Web 2.0 in US academic libraries: a survey of ARL library websites , 2011, Program.

[19]  M. Bates The invisible substrate of information science , 1999 .

[20]  Ruth Sara Connell,et al.  Survey of Web Developers in Academic Libraries , 2008 .

[21]  Susan Heaford Qualitative Research for the Information Professional: A Practical Handbook (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[22]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Redesigning Library Services: A Manifesto , 1992 .

[23]  Peter Hernon Statistics: a component of the research process , 1991 .

[24]  Thura Mack,et al.  Designing for Experts: How Scholars Approach an Academic Library Web Site , 2004 .

[25]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Rigorous Systematic Bibliography. , 1976 .

[26]  Michael Stephens Modeling the role of blogging in librarianship , 2007 .

[27]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Value-Added Processes in Information Systems , 1987 .

[28]  Tom Wilson,et al.  Models in Information Behavior Research , 1999 .

[29]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[30]  S. K. Hastings Selection and Evaluation of Networked Information Resources , 1998 .

[31]  Janet Brennan Croft Changing Research Patterns and Implications for Web Page Design , 2001 .

[32]  Matt Benzing Luwak: a content management solution , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[33]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation , 2009 .

[34]  K. Krippendorff Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[35]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[36]  Wendy A. Warr,et al.  Social software: fun and games, or business tools? , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[37]  Lee Feigenbaum,et al.  The Semantic Web in action. , 2007, Scientific American.

[38]  D. Wallace EditorialAcademic Library and Research in the Twenty-First Century: Linking Practice and Research , 2007 .

[39]  David W. Lewis,et al.  A Strategy for Academic Libraries in the First Quarter of the 21st Century , 2007 .

[40]  Chris Kartchner Content Management Systems: Getting from Concept to Reality , 1998 .

[41]  Mary K. Taylor Library Webmasters: satisfactions, dissatisfactions and expectations , 2000 .

[42]  Joan M Reitz,et al.  Dictionary for library and information science , 2004 .

[43]  Jennifer N. Sias,et al.  Does Anyone Need Help Out There? , 2004 .

[44]  John T. Butler,et al.  LibData to LibCMS: One library's evolutionary pathway to a content management system , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[45]  Helen Partridge,et al.  Becoming "Librarian 2.0": The Skills, Knowledge, and Attributes Required by Library and Information Science Professionals in a Web 2.0 World (and Beyond) , 2010, Libr. Trends.

[46]  M Sandelowski,et al.  Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. , 2000, Research in nursing & health.

[47]  Barbara A. Blummer A Literature Review of Academic Library Web Page Studies , 2007 .

[48]  M. Buckland The landscape of information science: the American society for Information Science at 62 , 1999 .

[49]  Sara E. Morris,et al.  Forgotten Resources: Subject Guides in the Era of Web 2.0 , 2010 .

[50]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Michael Smith,et al.  21st Century Readers' Aids: Past History and Future Directions , 2008 .

[52]  Debbie L. Rabina,et al.  Information professionals' attitude toward the adoption of innovations in everyday life , 2007, Inf. Res..

[53]  Beth Thomsett-Scott Providing a Complete Menu: Using Competitive Usability in a Home Page Usability Study , 2005 .

[54]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy , 1977 .

[55]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[56]  Mary Lynn Rice-Lively,et al.  The Role of Academic Librarians in the Era of Information Technology , 1997 .

[57]  Roy J. Byrd,et al.  Knowledge portals and the emerging digital knowledge workplace , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[58]  Elizabeth L. Black Selecting a Web Content Management System for an Academic Library Website , 2011 .

[59]  Lili Luo,et al.  Web 2.0 Integration in Information Literacy Instruction: An Overview , 2010 .

[60]  Pamela Kostur,et al.  Managing Enterprise Content: A Unified Content Strategy , 2002 .

[61]  Brian C. O'Connor,et al.  Doing Things with Information: Beyond Indexing and Abstracting , 2008 .

[62]  Jason D. Baker,et al.  Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements , 2006 .

[63]  Anne Marie Donovan,et al.  Tactical Electric Power Digital Library , 2005 .

[64]  Rebecca Jackson,et al.  Internet Subject Guides in Academic Libraries: An Analysis of Contents, Practices, and Opinions , 2004 .

[65]  Michal Strutin Making Research Guides More Useful and More Well Used. , 2008 .

[66]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Web Content Management , 2001, Bled eConference.

[67]  John C. Thomas,et al.  The knowledge management puzzle: Human and social factors in knowledge management , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[68]  Araby Greene Managing subject guides with SQL Server and ASP.Net , 2008, Libr. Hi Tech.

[69]  Marybeth Grimes,et al.  A great deal of time and effort : An overview of creating and maintaining internet-based subject guides , 1999 .

[70]  James L. Mullins,et al.  Top ten assumptions for the future of academic libraries and librarians A report from the ACRL research committee , 2007 .

[71]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[72]  W. Dutton,et al.  Continuity or Transformation? Social and Technical Perspectives on Information and Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[73]  Zina O'Leary,et al.  The essential guide to doing research , 2004 .

[74]  Guy Leach,et al.  Beyond HTML: Developing and re-imagining library web guides in a content management system , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[75]  M. Sandelowski Sample size in qualitative research. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[76]  John Dupuis,et al.  CREATING DYNAMIC SUBJECT GUIDES , 2004 .

[77]  Isto Huvila,et al.  What is Library 2.0? , 2009, J. Documentation.

[78]  Michael Seadle Content management systems , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[79]  L. Christensen,et al.  Educational Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches , 2000 .

[80]  Kate Manuel,et al.  Practical Research Methods for Librarians and Information Professionals , 2007 .

[81]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[82]  Karen A. Coombs,et al.  Building a Library Web Site on the Pillars of Web 2.0. , 2007 .

[83]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Reference library service in the digital environment , 2008 .

[84]  Shannon M. Staley Academic Subject Guides: A Case Study of Use at San José State University , 2007 .

[85]  Karen Beesley XML: Solution for the Future , 2001 .

[86]  Nadaleen Tempelman-Kluit,et al.  The Other Way In , 2007 .

[87]  Kevin Curran,et al.  Involving the user Through Library 2.0 , 2006 .

[88]  Joann T. Hackos,et al.  Content management for dynamic Web delivery , 2002 .

[89]  Jiali Ye Overcoming Challenges to Conducting Online Surveys , 2007 .

[90]  Marylaine Block Making It Up As I Went Along: A Webmaster's Saga of Trial and Error. , 1998 .

[91]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[92]  Jia Mi,et al.  Library 2.0 or Library III : returning to leadership , 2011 .

[93]  Carla Dunsmore A Qualitative Study of Web-Mounted Pathfinders Created by Academic Business Libraries , 2002 .

[94]  Curtis R. Rogers,et al.  Social media, libraries, and Web 2.0 : how American libraries are using new tools for public relations and to attract new users , 2009 .

[95]  Nedelina Tchangalova,et al.  Subject Guides: Putting a New Spin on an Old Concept , 2008 .

[96]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  Libraries of the future , 1965, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[97]  Paul Anderson,et al.  `All That Glisters Is Not Gold' — Web 2.0 And The Librarian , 2007, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[98]  A. Dillon Conclusion: So what is this thing called Information? , 2005 .

[99]  Jeff Wisniewski,et al.  Content Management Systems. , 2007 .

[100]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[101]  Julia Gross,et al.  Twenty-three steps to learning Web 2.0 technologies in an academic library , 2008, Electron. Libr..

[102]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[103]  C. Gurau The Ethics of Online Surveys , 2007 .

[104]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Accommodating the User's Information Search Process: Challenges for Information Retrieval System Designers , 2005 .

[105]  Alexander G. Kelly Review of: Srikantaiah, T. Kanti & Koenig, Michael E.D. (Eds.). Knowledge management in practice: connections and context. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2008 , 2008, Inf. Res..

[106]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information and information systems , 1991 .

[107]  Arthur Hendricks Webmasters, web policies, and academic libraries: a survey , 2007, Libr. Hi Tech.

[108]  Robert Slater The Library Web Site: Collaborative Content Creation and Management , 2008 .

[109]  Chun Wie Choo Information management for the intelligent organization (2nd ed.): the art of scanning the environment , 1999 .

[110]  Chad M. Fennell Msls Content Management and Web 2.0 with Drupal , 2007 .

[111]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Understanding and Communicating Social Informatics: A Framework for Studying and Teaching the Human Contexts of Information and Communication Technologies , 2005, Program.

[112]  Luigina Vileno From paper to electronic, the evolution of pathfinders: a review of the literature , 2007 .

[113]  Yongi-Mi Kim,et al.  Factors Affecting University Library Website Design , 2011 .

[114]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  Studying the Value of Library and Information Services. Part I: Establishing a Theoretical Framework. , 1997 .

[115]  Lars Höglund,et al.  Review of: Koenig, Michael E.D. and Srikantaiah, T. Kanti (Eds.) Knowledge management lessons learned: what works and what doesn't. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2004 , 2005, Inf. Res..

[116]  N. Roberts,et al.  Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority: P. Wilson. London: Greenwood Press, 1983. 210 pp. ISBN 0 313 23763 8. £28.95. , 1985 .

[117]  Camilla Fulton Library perspectives on Web content management systems , 2010, First Monday.

[118]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  The duality of knowledge , 2002, Inf. Res..

[119]  Maira Bundza,et al.  Work of the Web Weavers: Web Development in Academic Libraries , 2009 .

[120]  Alan Aldridge,et al.  Surveying the Social World: Principles and Practice in Survey Research , 2001 .

[121]  Brian Detlor,et al.  Academic Library Web Sites: Current Practice and Future Directions , 2006 .

[122]  Corina Pascu,et al.  The potential disruptive impact of Internet2 based technologies , 2007, First Monday.

[123]  L. Ross,et al.  Exploring the Future of Academic Libraries: A Definitional Approach. , 2009 .

[124]  Carol Siri Johnson Analyze Before You Act: CMS and Knowledge Transfer , 2009 .