Dose calculation of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy using Monte Carlo.

PURPOSE Using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery technique gantry position, multi-leaf collimator (MLC) as well as dose rate change dynamically during the application. However, additional components can be dynamically altered throughout the dose delivery such as the collimator or the couch. Thus, the degrees of freedom increase allowing almost arbitrary dynamic trajectories for the beam. While the dose delivery of such dynamic trajectories for linear accelerators is technically possible, there is currently no dose calculation and validation tool available. Thus, the aim of this work is to develop a dose calculation and verification tool for dynamic trajectories using Monte Carlo (MC) methods. METHODS The dose calculation for dynamic trajectories is implemented in the previously developed Swiss Monte Carlo Plan (SMCP). SMCP interfaces the treatment planning system Eclipse with a MC dose calculation algorithm and is already able to handle dynamic MLC and gantry rotations. Hence, the additional dynamic components, namely the collimator and the couch, are described similarly to the dynamic MLC by defining data pairs of positions of the dynamic component and the corresponding MU-fractions. For validation purposes, measurements are performed with the Delta4 phantom and film measurements using the developer mode on a TrueBeam linear accelerator. These measured dose distributions are then compared with the corresponding calculations using SMCP. First, simple academic cases applying one-dimensional movements are investigated and second, more complex dynamic trajectories with several simultaneously moving components are compared considering academic cases as well as a clinically motivated prostate case. RESULTS The dose calculation for dynamic trajectories is successfully implemented into SMCP. The comparisons between the measured and calculated dose distributions for the simple as well as for the more complex situations show an agreement which is generally within 3% of the maximum dose or 3mm. The required computation time for the dose calculation remains the same when the additional dynamic moving components are included. CONCLUSION The results obtained for the dose comparisons for simple and complex situations suggest that the extended SMCP is an accurate dose calculation and efficient verification tool for dynamic trajectory radiotherapy. This work was supported by Varian Medical Systems.

[1]  The Swiss IMRT dosimetry intercomparison using a thorax phantom. , 2010, Medical physics.

[2]  Michael K Fix,et al.  An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  I. Kawrakow,et al.  VMC/sup ++/, a MC algorithm optimized for electron and photon beam dose calculations for RTP , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[4]  Sridhar Yaddanapudi,et al.  Daily QA of linear accelerators using only EPID and OBI. , 2015, Medical physics.

[5]  Suresh Senan,et al.  Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  M. Fix,et al.  Monte Carlo implementation, validation, and characterization of a 120 leaf MLC. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  Lei Xing,et al.  Trajectory modulated prone breast irradiation: a LINAC-based technique combining intensity modulated delivery and motion of the couch. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Ke Sheng,et al.  4π non-coplanar liver SBRT: a novel delivery technique. , 2013, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[9]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  P. Keall,et al.  Dosimetric considerations for patients with HIP prostheses undergoing pelvic irradiation. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 63. , 2003, Medical physics.

[11]  M. Fix,et al.  Comparison of monte carlo collimator transport methods for photon treatment planning in radiotherapy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[12]  M. Fix,et al.  Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam. , 2011, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[13]  Lei Xing,et al.  Quality control procedures for dynamic treatment delivery techniques involving couch motion. , 2014, Medical physics.

[14]  David Sjostrom,et al.  Implementing RapidArc into clinical routine: a comprehensive program from machine QA to TPS validation and patient QA. , 2011, Medical physics.

[15]  Margie Hunt,et al.  Choreographing couch and collimator in volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  K. Otto,et al.  A simple and robust trajectory‐based stereotactic radiosurgery treatment , 2017, Medical physics.

[17]  Colin G Orton,et al.  Point/Counterpoint. Because of the advantages of rotational techniques, conventional IMRT will soon become obsolete. , 2014, Medical physics.

[18]  P. Munro,et al.  Evaluation of a new six degrees of freedom couch for radiation therapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[19]  Ke Sheng,et al.  4π noncoplanar stereotactic body radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: potential to improve tumor control and late toxicity. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  C. Ling,et al.  Commissioning and quality assurance of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery system. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Gilmer Valdes,et al.  Use of TrueBeam developer mode for imaging QA , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[22]  Michael K Fix,et al.  Assessment of patient setup errors in IGRT in combination with a six degrees of freedom couch. , 2014, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.