IMRT treatment planning:- a comparative inter-system and inter-centre planning exercise of the ESTRO QUASIMODO group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of this work was a comparison of realistic IMRT plans based on the same CT-image data set and a common predefined set of dose objectives for the planning target volume and the organs at risk. This work was part of the larger European QUASIMODO IMRT verification project. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eleven IMRT plans were produced by nine different European groups, each applying a representative set of clinically used IMRT treatment planning systems. The plans produced were to be deliverable in a clinically acceptable treatment time with the local technical equipment. All plans were characterized using a set of different quality measures such as dose-volume histograms, number of monitor units and treatment time. RESULTS Only one plan was able to fulfil all dose objectives strictly; six plans failed some of the objectives but were still considered to be clinically acceptable; four plans were not able to reach the objectives. Additional quality scores such as the number of monitor units and treatment time showed large variations, which mainly depend on the delivery technique. CONCLUSION The presented planning study showed that with nearly all presently available IMRT planning and delivery systems comparable dose distributions could be achieved if the planning goals are clearly defined in advance.

[1]  Peter Smeets,et al.  Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. , 2003, Medical physics.

[3]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  D Followill,et al.  Estimates of whole-body dose equivalent produced by beam intensity modulated conformal therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  I. Rosen,et al.  Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: a joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  M. Mattia,et al.  IMRT optimization: variability of solutions and its radiobiological impact. , 2004, Medical physics.

[7]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Report of a Study on IMRT Planning Strategies for Ethmoid Sinus Cancer , 2002, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[8]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  The Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy , 2000, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[9]  C C Ling,et al.  Delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional multileaf collimator: comparison of dynamic and segmental methods. , 2001, Medical physics.

[10]  Fridtjof Nüsslin,et al.  Hyperion — An integrated IMRT planning tool , 2000 .

[11]  C. De Wagter,et al.  An inter-centre quality assurance network for IMRT verification: results of the ESTRO QUASIMODO project. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Intensity modulated irradiation of a thorax phantom: comparisons between measurements, Monte Carlo calculations and pencil beam calculations. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Werner De Gersem,et al.  Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT): first clinical experience. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Alessandra Bolsi,et al.  Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.