Chrysotile effects on human lung cell carcinoma in culture: 3-D reconstruction and DNA quantification by image analysis

BackgroundChrysotile is considered less harmful to human health than other types of asbestos fibers. Its clearance from the lung is faster and, in comparison to amphibole forms of asbestos, chrysotile asbestos fail to accumulate in the lung tissue due to a mechanism involving fibers fragmentation in short pieces. Short exposure to chrysotile has not been associated with any histopathological alteration of lung tissue.MethodsThe present work focuses on the association of small chrysotile fibers with interphasic and mitotic human lung cancer cells in culture, using for analyses confocal laser scanning microscopy and 3D reconstructions. The main goal was to perform the analysis of abnormalities in mitosis of fibers-containing cells as well as to quantify nuclear DNA content of treated cells during their recovery in fiber-free culture medium.ResultsHK2 cells treated with chrysotile for 48 h and recovered in additional periods of 24, 48 and 72 h in normal medium showed increased frequency of multinucleated and apoptotic cells. DNA ploidy of the cells submitted to the same chrysotile treatment schedules showed enhanced aneuploidy values. The results were consistent with the high frequency of multipolar spindles observed and with the presence of fibers in the intercellular bridge during cytokinesis.ConclusionThe present data show that 48 h chrysotile exposure can cause centrosome amplification, apoptosis and aneuploid cell formation even when long periods of recovery were provided. Internalized fibers seem to interact with the chromatin during mitosis, and they could also interfere in cytokinesis, leading to cytokinesis failure which forms aneuploid or multinucleated cells with centrosome amplification.

[1]  P. Duesberg,et al.  Aneuploidy and cancer: from correlation to causation. , 2006, Contributions to microbiology.

[2]  H. Kampinga,et al.  Centrosomes split in the presence of impaired DNA integrity during mitosis. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  D. Eastmond,et al.  Induction of micronuclei, hyperdiploidy and chromosomal breakage affecting the centric/pericentric regions of chromosomes 1 and 9 in human amniotic fluid cells after treatment with asbestos and ceramic fibers. , 1997, Mutation research.

[4]  E. Nishida,et al.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) is required for centrosome duplication in mammalian cells , 1999, Current Biology.

[5]  M. Watson,et al.  INHIBITION OF CYTOKINESIS BY ASBESTOS AND SYNTHETIC FIBRES , 1999, Cell biology international.

[6]  T. Hei,et al.  New Insight into Intrachromosomal Deletions Induced by Chrysotile in the gpt delta Transgenic Mutation Assay , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  David M Bernstein,et al.  Comparison of Calidria Chrysotile Asbestos to Pure Tremolite: Final Results of the Inhalation Biopersistence and Histopathology Examination Following Short-Term Exposure , 2005, Inhalation toxicology.

[8]  M. Bonaldo,et al.  Comparative characterization of a human large cell lung carcinoma cell line and the xenograft derived cell line. , 1991, Cell biology international reports.

[9]  J. Nevins,et al.  E2F: a link between the Rb tumor suppressor protein and viral oncoproteins. , 1992, Science.

[10]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Genetic instability in colorectal cancers , 1997, Nature.

[11]  A. Churg,et al.  Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of asbestosis and silicosis. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  B. Gilks,et al.  Rapid short-term clearance of chrysotile compared with amosite asbestos in the guinea pig. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[13]  L. Korkina,et al.  Peculiarities of the clastogenic properties of chrysotile-asbestos fibers and zeolite particles. , 1993, Mutation research.

[14]  A. Seaton,et al.  Asbestos: scientific developments and implications for public policy. , 1990, Science.

[15]  W. Theurkauf,et al.  Drosophila Checkpoint Kinase 2 Couples Centrosome Function and Spindle Assembly to Genomic Integrity , 2003, Cell.

[16]  A. Multani,et al.  Aneuploidy, stem cells and cancer. , 2006, EXS.

[17]  B. Brinkley,et al.  Intracellular protein binding to asbestos induces aneuploidy in human lung fibroblasts. , 2006, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[18]  S. Doxsey,et al.  Centrosome control of the cell cycle. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[19]  T. Hei,et al.  Serial Review : Role of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species ( ROS / RNS ) in Lung Injury and Diseases , 2003 .

[20]  S. Maness,et al.  Cytotoxic and cytogenetic effects of asbestos on human bronchial epithelial cells in culture. , 1993, Carcinogenesis.

[21]  W. Earnshaw,et al.  Centrosome amplification induced by DNA damage occurs during a prolonged G2 phase and involves ATM , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[22]  K. Fukasawa,et al.  Centrosome amplification, chromosome instability and cancer development. , 2005, Cancer letters.

[23]  J. Barrett,et al.  Possible cellular and molecular mechanisms for asbestos carcinogenicity. , 1992, American journal of industrial medicine.

[24]  E. Dopp,et al.  ROS-mediated genotoxicity of asbestos-cement in mammalian lung cells in vitro , 2005, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[25]  I. Joekes,et al.  Yeast cells long-term interaction with asbestos fibers. , 2005, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[26]  O. Sibon,et al.  DNA-replication/DNA-damage-dependent centrosome inactivation in Drosophila embryos , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  J. Barrett,et al.  Induction by asbestos fibers of anaphase abnormalities: mechanism for aneuploidy induction and possibly carcinogenesis. , 1985, Carcinogenesis.

[28]  J. Bartek,et al.  Structure meets function--centrosomes, genome maintenance and the DNA damage response. , 2006, Experimental cell research.