Response-selection Conflict Contributes to Inhibition of Return

Here we examined the relationship between inhibition of return (IOR) and response-selection conflict. In two go/no-go and spatial-cueing experiments, we measured the amplitude of the fronto-central N2 event-related potential component to estimate the degree of response-selection conflict for validly cued and invalidly cued targets. When the probability of a go target was high (Experiment 1), both the amplitude of the N2 elicited on no-go trials and the number of false alarm errors were greater on invalid-cue than on valid-cue trials. When the probability of a go target was low (Experiment 2), neither of these effects was observed and the magnitude of the IOR effect was greatly reduced. These results show that a relative response bias toward responding on invalid-cue trials contributes to the IOR reaction time effect when the required response is prepotent.

[1]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[3]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Inhibition of Return From Stimulus to Response , 2004, Psychological science.

[4]  C. Carter,et al.  The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  T. Paus Primate anterior cingulate cortex: Where motor control, drive and cognition interface , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Shipp The brain circuitry of attention , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  R. Klein,et al.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  R. Klein,et al.  Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. , 1994 .

[9]  B. Milliken,et al.  Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. , 1999, The Journal of general psychology.

[10]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Cortical expressions of inhibition of return , 2006, Brain Research.

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[15]  Edmund Wascher,et al.  Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: an EEG study of inhibition of return. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of the Attentional Spotlight: Neuronal Correlates of Attentional Capture and Inhibition of Return in Early Visual Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  P. Berg,et al.  Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials I: Scalp topography , 2005, Brain Topography.

[18]  George R. Mangun,et al.  Reflexive Attention Modulates Processing of Visual Stimuli in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Psychological science.

[19]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[21]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Selective Visual Attention: Selective Cuing, Selective Cognitive Processing, and Selective Response Processing , 1994 .

[22]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  On the causes and effects of inhibition of return , 1998 .

[23]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[24]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return: sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  R. Klein,et al.  Two mechanisms underlying inhibition of return , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Reorienting attention and inhibition of return , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  David J. Prime,et al.  On the relationship between occipital cortex activity and inhibition of return. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[28]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[29]  Giovanni Berlucchi,et al.  Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[30]  J Leon Kenemans,et al.  Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  Response selection influences inhibition of return , 2005 .

[32]  G. Band,et al.  Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition , 2003, Psychological research.

[33]  R. Klein,et al.  Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  What is inhibited in inhibition of return? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.