Validating the Feedback Orientation Scale in a Leadership Development Context

Feedback orientation is an individual difference variable that represents individuals’ receptivity to feedback. In 2010, Linderbaum and Levy developed and validated a measure of feedback orientation called the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). We investigated the validity of the FOS using 172 participants in a leadership development program designed for middle- to senior-level leaders. Our results support the FOS’s convergent validity, as it was correlated with implicit person theory (assumptions regarding the malleability of personal attributes) and achievement motivation. We also found support for the FOS’s criterion-related validity, as it was correlated with participants’ reactions to their 360-degree feedback. Participants’ feedback orientation, however, was unrelated to coach ratings of their openness, likelihood to change, and defensiveness during their feedback sessions.

[1]  Jason J. Dahling,et al.  Correlates and Consequences of Feedback Orientation in Organizations , 2012 .

[2]  M. Mount,et al.  Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: a meta-analysis. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Beth A. Linderbaum,et al.  The Development and Validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS) , 2010 .

[4]  James W. Smither,et al.  Are Cultural Characteristics Associated with the Relationship between Self and Others' Ratings of Leadership? , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[6]  W. Arthur,et al.  Feedback acceptance in developmental assessment centers: the role of feedback message, participant personality, and affective response to the feedback session , 2008 .

[7]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  The Effect of Upward Feedback on Managerial Behavior , 2008 .

[8]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Keen to Help? Managers' Implicit Person Theories and Their Subsequent Employee Coaching , 2006 .

[10]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[11]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Flow experiences at work: for high need achievers alone? , 2005 .

[12]  Peter A. Heslin,et al.  The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Leanne E. Atwater,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360° feedback , 2005 .

[14]  S. Silverman,et al.  When employees at work don't get it: A model for enhancing individual employee change in response to performance feedback , 2005 .

[15]  James W. Smither,et al.  The Relationship Between Leaders’ Personality and Their Reactions to and Use of Multisource Feedback , 2005 .

[16]  James W. Smither,et al.  DOES PERFORMANCE IMPROVE FOLLOWING MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK? A THEORETICAL MODEL, META‐ANALYSIS, AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS , 2005 .

[17]  James A. Breaugh,et al.  Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement , 2003 .

[18]  James W. Smither,et al.  Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process , 2002 .

[19]  Andrew Mayo,et al.  The role of employee development in the growth of intellectual capital , 2000 .

[20]  M. Lindell,et al.  A Revised Index of Interrater Agreement for Multi-Item Ratings of a Single Target , 1999 .

[21]  C. Dweck,et al.  Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. , 1998 .

[22]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[23]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[24]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[25]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  S. Ashford.  Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective , 1986 .

[27]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Reactions to Feedback: The Role of Attributions , 1985 .

[28]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .

[29]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[30]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[31]  S. Fineman.  The Achievement Motive Construct and its Measurement: Where Are We Now?. , 1977 .

[32]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[34]  E. S. Conklin.  Human Motivation , 1932, The Journal of Religion.

[35]  S. Ashford,et al.  Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective , 1986 .

[36]  Lisa S. Blackwell,et al.  Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. , 2007, Child development.

[37]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  Commitment to family roles: effects on managers' attitudes and performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  J. Mathieu,et al.  To Empower or Not to Empower Your Sales Force? An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Leadership Empowerment Behavior on Customer Satisfaction and Performance , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Leanne E. Atwater,et al.  360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. , 2001 .

[40]  James W. Smither,et al.  Career-related continuous learning: Defining the construct and mapping the process. , 1999 .

[41]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[42]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .