Improved estimation of direction of arrival of sound sources for hearing aids using gyroscopic information

Determining the direction of arrival (DOA) of a sound source is important in spatial audio signal processing, as it can lead to substantial improvement in noise reduction performance. Techniques such as generalized cross correlation with phase transform (GCC-PHAT) and adaptive eigenvalue decomposition (AED) perform optimally when the measurement microphones are fixed in place. However, hearing-aid microphones move with the listener?s head movements, which can result in momentarily inaccurate directional estimates and noise artifacts in the output signal. Techniques such as GCC-PHAT experience degraded short-term performance in the presence of multiple signals and noise. The system presented measures instantaneous head movement velocity using a micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) gyroscope attached to binaurally-communicating hearing aids. Estimates of DOA for physically stationary sources are shifted based on the gyroscope's head-movement information. Using GCC-PHAT with gyroscopic input can produce robust in situ DOA estimates for several sources in reverberant environments. In addition, the gyroscope allows an adaptive beamformer to be steered to a target direction, compensating for head movements on a very short timescale during DOA estimation. Results show improved localization performance over a standard GCC-PHAT system during head movements.

[1]  W Noble,et al.  The contribution of head motion cues to localization of low-pass noise , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  B C Wheeler,et al.  Localization of multiple sound sources with two microphones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Contextual recognition of head gestures , 2005, ICMI '05.

[4]  G. Carter,et al.  The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay , 1976 .

[5]  Joseph H. DiBiase A High-Accuracy, Low-Latency Technique for Talker Localization in Reverberant Environments Using Microphone Arrays , 2000 .

[6]  Benesty,et al.  Adaptive eigenvalue decomposition algorithm for passive acoustic source localization , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Gary W. Elko,et al.  FIRST- AND SECOND-ORDER ADAPTIVE DIFFERENTIAL MICROPHONE ARRAYS , 2001 .

[8]  Walter Kellermann,et al.  Robustness of Acoustic Multiple-Source Localization in Adverse Environments , 2006 .

[9]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Database of Multichannel In-Ear and Behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[10]  M. Omologo,et al.  Comparison Between Different Sound Source Localization Techniques Based on a Real Data Collection , 2008, 2008 Hands-Free Speech Communication and Microphone Arrays.

[11]  F L Wightman,et al.  Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.