Digital soil property mapping and uncertainty estimation using soil class probability rasters

article i nfo Digital soil property mapping Weighted means Prediction interval Uncertainty estimation Probability rasters The objective of theworkpresentedinthispaperwastoinvestigatehowrastersof theprobabilitiesofoccurrence of soil classesmay beused tocreate digital soil propertymaps and mapsof theirassociateduncertainties.The ap- proach we present is formalised in an algorithm we developed called "Digital Soil Property Mapping Using Soil Class Probability Rasters" (PROPR). Thesoilclassprobabilityrasterswerederivedpreviouslyfromaspatialdisaggregationofthe1:250,000-scaleDal- rymple Shire legacy soil polygon map from central Queensland, Australia. We created digital soil property maps of soil pH 1:5 H2O and their uncertainties (as indicated by estimates of the limits of the 90% prediction interval) at six depth increments down the soil profile (0- 5c m, 5-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-60 cm, 60-100 cm, 100-200 cm). The calculation of the weighted mean soil pH value for each depth incre- ment at each grid cell was based on reference pH values for each soil class and used the probabilities of occur- rence at each grid cell as weights. The calculation of the prediction interval limits for each depth increment involved sampling from the triangular distribution of the soil pH of each soil class using the soil class probabilitiesat each grid cell as weights in order to identify the number of samples to draw from each distribution. The 90% prediction interval limits were then es- timated as the 5th and 95th percentiles of the distribution of samples drawn from the soil classes' triangular distributions. The maps of soil pH displayed strong spatial patterns. Soil pH generally increased with depth. Uncertainty gener- ally increased with depth. Validation on 300 randomly-selected soil profiles returned a Lin's concordance corre- lation coefficient of 0.193 at the surface increasing to 0.266 at depth. RMSE increased with depth from about 0.75 pH units at the surface to 1.15 at depth. Soil class probability rasters are useful for generating digital soil property maps and maps of the associated uncertainties. Validation left room for improvement but the quality of the results is probably strongly affected by the quality of the spatial disaggregation that produced the soil class probability rasters. The PROPR approach may be useful in situations where profile observations are limiting but where legacy soil maps are available. Generation of the soil class probability rasters to use in PROPR is a predictive exercise in itself and so is also sub- ject to uncertainty. The probability rasters likely can be derived by several methods including logistic regression and data mining; the probability rasters we used were derived via spatial disaggregation of a legacy soil polygon map. PROPR may be useful in situations where profile observations are limiting but where legacy soil maps are avail- able. The soil class probability rasters need to be produced separately. Information on the within-soil-class vari- ability of the target soil property at each depth increment must be known in order to establish the triangular distributions for the uncertainty estimation. PROPR may reduce reliance on having sufficient soil profile observations in areas wheresuch data is limiting. We usedavailableprofileobservationstoestimatethewithin-soil-classvariabilityinordertoestablishtriangulardis-

[1]  David Johnson,et al.  The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis , 1997 .

[2]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Modelling soil attribute depth functions with equal-area quadratic smoothing splines , 1999 .

[3]  D. Keefer,et al.  Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random Variables , 1983 .

[4]  R. Brewer,et al.  A Handbook of Australian Soils , 1968 .

[5]  A. McBratney,et al.  Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: heterotopic cokriging and regression-kriging , 1995 .

[6]  Chris Moran,et al.  Disaggregation of polygons of surficial geology and soil maps using spatial modelling and legacy data , 2001 .

[7]  Wei Sun,et al.  Disaggregating and harmonising soil map units through resampled classification trees , 2014 .

[8]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Soil Attribute Prediction Using Terrain Analysis , 1993 .

[9]  R. Webster,et al.  Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties , 1992 .

[10]  Ilyes Jenhani,et al.  Disaggregation of component soil series on an Ohio County soil survey map using possibilistic decision trees , 2014 .

[11]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[12]  E. Davidson,et al.  Estimating regional carbon stocks and spatially covarying edaphic factors using soil maps at three scales , 1993 .

[13]  R. Webster,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties: I The semi‐variogram and punctual kriging , 1980, European Journal of Soil Science.

[14]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Updating the 1:50,000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: A multinomial logistic regression approach , 2009 .

[15]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Using model averaging to combine soil property rasters from legacy soil maps and from point data , 2014 .

[16]  A. Zhu,et al.  Derivation of Soil Properties Using a Soil Land Inference Model (SoLIM) , 1997 .

[17]  R. Webster,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. II. Block kriging. , 1980 .

[18]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[19]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Digital Soil Mapping: A State of the Art , 2008 .

[20]  Peter Scull,et al.  Predictive soil mapping: a review , 2003 .

[21]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Mapping continuous depth functions of soil carbon storage and available water capacity , 2009 .

[22]  Z. Libohova,et al.  Equal-area spline functions applied to a legacy soil database to create weighted-means maps of soil organic carbon at a continental scale , 2012 .

[23]  J. J. Gruijter,et al.  Application of fuzzy logic to Boolean models for digital soil assessment , 2011 .

[24]  M. C. Jones,et al.  A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation , 1991 .

[25]  A-Xing Zhu,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Approach to Data Integration for Soil Mapping , 1994 .

[26]  Marc Voltz,et al.  A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information , 1990 .

[27]  B. E. Livingston,et al.  WATER‐SUPPLYING POWER AND WATER‐ABSORBING POWER OF SOILS AS RELATED TO WILTING OF WHEAT AND COLEUS IN GREENHOUSE POT CULTURES1 , 1937 .

[28]  P. Hazelton,et al.  Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All the Numbers Mean? , 2017 .

[29]  A. McBratney,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties: V. Co-regionalization and multiple sampling strategy , 1983 .

[30]  J. Stoorvogel,et al.  Three-dimensional mapping of soil organic matter content using soil type-specific depth functions , 2011 .

[31]  A. McBratney,et al.  Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions , 1997 .

[32]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of soil property maps with statistical expert elicitation , 2013 .

[33]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Spatial prediction of soil properties from landform attributes derived from a digital elevation model , 1994 .

[34]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data , 2008 .

[35]  M. Fiorella,et al.  Regional Soil organic carbon storage estimates for western Oregon by multiple approaches , 1998 .

[36]  Terry Williams,et al.  Practical Use of Distributions in Network Analysis , 1992 .

[37]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Pedometric mapping of soil organic matter using a soil map with quantified uncertainty , 2010 .

[38]  Mike Grundy,et al.  Guidelines for Surveying Soil and Land Resources , 2008 .

[39]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Beyond Beta: Other Continuous Families Of Distributions With Bounded Support And Applications , 2004 .

[40]  N. McKenzie,et al.  Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation , 1999 .

[41]  B. Schröder,et al.  Spatial disaggregation of complex soil map units: A decision-tree based approach in Bavarian forest soils , 2012 .

[42]  B. Henderson,et al.  Australia-wide predictions of soil properties using decision trees , 2005 .

[43]  R. Bryant,et al.  Sources of Uncertainty Affecting Soil Organic Carbon Estimates in Northern New York , 2003 .