As turbofan engine bypass ratios continue to increase, the contribution of the turbine to the engine noise signature is receiving more attention. Understanding the relative importance of the various turbine noise generation mechanisms and the characteristics of the turbine acoustic transmission loss are essential ingredients in developing robust reduced-order models for predicting the turbine noise signature. A computationally based investigation has been undertaken to help guide the development of a turbine noise prediction capability that does not rely on empiricism. As proof-of-concept for this approach, two highly detailed numerical simulations of the unsteady flow field inside the first stage of a modern high-pressure turbine were carried out. The simulations were computed using TURBO, which is an unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes code capable of multi-stage simulations. Spectral and modal analysis of the unsteady pressure data from the numerical simulation of the turbine stage show a circumferential modal distribution that is consistent with the Tyler-Sofrin rule. Within the high-pressure turbine, the interaction of velocity, pressure and temperature fluctuations with the downstream blade rows are all possible tone noise source mechanisms. We have taken the initial step in determining the source strength hierarchy by artificially reducing the level of temperature fluctuations in the turbine flowfield. This was accomplished by changing the vane cooling flow temperature in order to mitigate the vane thermal wake in the second of the two simulations. The results indicated that, despite a dramatic change in the vane cooling flow, the computed modal levels changed very little indicating that the contribution of temperature fluctuations to the overall pressure field is rather small compared with the viscous and potential field interaction mechanisms.
[1]
D. Mathews,et al.
Review of theory and methods for turbine noise prediction
,
1975
.
[2]
J. P. Chen,et al.
A Parallel Flow Solver for Unsteady Multiple Blade Row Turbomachinery Simulations
,
2001
.
[3]
Michael D. Hathaway,et al.
The Influence of Compressor Blade Row Interaction Modeling on Performance Estimates From Time-Accurate, Multistage, Navier–Stokes Simulations
,
2008
.
[4]
Dale E. Van Zante,et al.
The Influence of Compressor Blade Row Interaction Modeling on Performance Estimates From Time-Accurate, Multi-Stage, Navier-Stokes Simulations
,
2005
.
[5]
H. Pitsch,et al.
Detailed modeling of combustion noise using a hydrodynamic / acoustic splitting model
,
2008
.
[6]
M. Nallasamy,et al.
Comparison of Numerical Schemes for a Realistic Computational Aeroacoustics Benchmark Problem
,
2004
.
[7]
Eric Nesbitt.
Towards a Quieter Low Pressure Turbine: Design Characteristics and Prediction Needs
,
2010
.