Necessary and sufficient conditions for stability on finite time horizon

Control theory is often interested in studying stability and stabilization of dynamical systems in an infinite time horizon. However, in many practical situations, focusing on the system behavior in a finite time interval is more important than requiring the system to reach a given equilibrium. Analysis on finite time horizon can be useful, for example, to study state and output transients due to disturbances or to examine the effects of sudden changes of the state variable due to external or internal system perturbations. Moreover, some systems naturally evolve in a finite time interval, as for example earthquakes or animal and vegetal systems. Furthermore, only qualitative behavior of dynamical systems are usually taken into account, as in Lyapunov Asymptotic Stability and classic Input-Output Lp-Stability. In many applications though, it is necessary to provide specific bounds to the system state and/or output variables. When dealing with linear models obtained linearizing nonlinear systems around an equilibrium, for example, it is important to keep the state trajectory close to the equilibrium point to avoid the effects of nonlinearity; the presence of variables physical constraints, like actuators saturations, is another example. Two different concepts of stability over a finite time horizon are dealt with in this thesis, namely Finite-Time Stability (FTS) and Input-Output Finite-Time Stability (IO-FTS). Their aim is to provide quantitative bounds, during a finite time interval, on the state and output trajectories, respectively. These quantitative bounds can be very useful for hybrid systems, e.g. Switching Linear Systems (SLSs), which present jumps in the state space in particular instants of time called resetting times. Hybrid systems exhibit both continuous-time and discrete-time dynamics and are used to model systems such as a thermostat turning the heat on and off, a server switching between buffers in a queueing networks, the gear shift control in a car. This thesis extends the FTS results already present in the previous literature, i.e. necessary and sufficient condition to check finite-time stability, to a larger class of hybrid systems, namely SLS. It also copes with the very useful case of uncertainty on the resetting times. In the context of IO-FTS, this thesis provides necessary and sufficient conditions to check the stability of Linear Time Varying (LTV) systems and sufficient conditions to check the stability of SLSs, also in the case of resetting times not a priori known. For both FTS and IO-FTS, dfferent stabilization problems are solved for SLSs and LTV systems. The new concept of Structured IO-FTS is introduced, which makes possible to limit the effort on the actuators by introducing quantitative bounds on the control inputs. Some applications are considered to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed control techniques.

[1]  Giuseppe Carannante,et al.  Experimental Performance of MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Sources Subject to Inhomogeneous Insolation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  R. W. Revans,et al.  Decision and Control , 1968 .

[3]  Wassim M. Haddad,et al.  Finite-time stabilization of nonlinear impulsive dynamical systems , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[4]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Low nonconvexity-rank bilinear matrix inequalities: algorithms and applications in robust controller and structure designs , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  O. Toker,et al.  On the NP-hardness of solving bilinear matrix inequalities and simultaneous stabilization with static output feedback , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[6]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal control: linear quadratic methods , 1990 .

[7]  G. De Tommasi,et al.  Finite-time stabilization of switching linear systems with uncertain resetting times , 2011, 2011 19th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED).

[8]  Tong Heng Lee,et al.  A heuristic approach to solving a class of bilinear matrix inequality problems , 2002, Syst. Control. Lett..

[9]  Timothy Gordon,et al.  A Comparison of Adaptive LQG and Nonlinear Controllers for Vehicle Suspension Systems , 1991 .

[10]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Input–output finite-time stabilisation of a class of hybrid systems via static output feedback , 2011, Int. J. Control.

[11]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Necessary and sufficient conditions for Input-Output Finite-Time stability of linear time-varying systems , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[12]  Masakazu Kojima,et al.  Branch-and-Cut Algorithms for the Bilinear Matrix Inequality Eigenvalue Problem , 2001, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[13]  L. Weiss,et al.  Finite time stability under perturbing forces and on product spaces , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  F. Amato,et al.  State constrained control of impulsive quadratic systems in integrated pest management , 2012 .

[15]  G. Ambrosino,et al.  Modeling tools for the ITER Central Interlock System , 2011 .

[16]  Gianmaria De Tommasi,et al.  Sufficient Conditions for Finite-Time Stability of Impulsive Dynamical Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Ying-Xu Yang,et al.  Finite‐time stability of switched positive linear systems , 2014 .

[18]  F. Amato,et al.  Finite-time stability of linear time-varying systems with jumps: Analysis and controller design , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[19]  Michael G. Safonov,et al.  Global optimization for the Biaffine Matrix Inequality problem , 1995, J. Glob. Optim..

[20]  T. Sugie,et al.  BMI global optimization based on branch and bound method taking account of the property of local minima , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[21]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Input-Output Finite-Time Stabilization of Linear Systems with Input Constraints , 2014 .

[22]  D. Wilson Convolution and Hankel operator norms for linear systems , 1989 .

[23]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Finite-Time Stability of Linear Time-Varying Systems: Analysis and Controller Design , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[24]  E. Yaz Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  Hong Chen,et al.  Constrained Control of Active Suspensions: An LMI Approach , 2005 .

[26]  W. Haddad,et al.  Finite-time stabilization of nonlinear impulsive dynamical systems☆ , 2008 .

[27]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Input-output finite-time stabilization with constrained control inputs , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[28]  Sophie Tarbouriech,et al.  Finite-Time Stabilization of Linear Time-Varying Continuous Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[29]  Dennis S. Bernstein,et al.  Finite-Time Stability of Continuous Autonomous Systems , 2000, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[30]  D. Henrion,et al.  Solving polynomial static output feedback problems with PENBMI , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[31]  Carlo Cosentino,et al.  Finite-time stabilization via dynamic output feedback, , 2006, Autom..

[32]  R. Braatz,et al.  A tutorial on linear and bilinear matrix inequalities , 2000 .

[33]  P. Olver Nonlinear Systems , 2013 .

[34]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Robust Control of Linear Systems Subject to Uncertain Time-Varying Parameters , 2006 .

[35]  Roy M. Howard,et al.  Linear System Theory , 1992 .

[36]  Konghui Guo,et al.  Constrained H/sub /spl infin// control of active suspensions: an LMI approach , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[37]  S. Sastry,et al.  Is there life after Zeno? Taking executions past the breaking (Zeno) point , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[38]  Uri Shaked,et al.  A new bounded real lemma representation for the continuous-time case , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[39]  Francesc Pozo,et al.  A velocity-based seismic control for base-isolated building structures , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[40]  Anthony N. Michel,et al.  Finite-time and practical stability of a class of stochastic dynamical systems , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[41]  Gianmaria De Tommasi,et al.  Plasma Vertical Stabilization in the ITER Tokamak via Constrained Static Output Feedback , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[42]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[43]  Y. ORLOV,et al.  Finite Time Stability and Robust Control Synthesis of Uncertain Switched Systems , 2004, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[44]  G. De Tommasi,et al.  Input-output finite-time stability of switching systems with uncertainties on the resetting times , 2011, 2011 19th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED).

[45]  G. Ambrosino,et al.  A flexible architecture for the rapid prototyping of control systems in fusion experiments , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[46]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Robust control of base-isolated structures under earthquake excitation , 1987 .

[47]  P. Dorato SHORT-TIME STABILITY IN LINEAR TIME-VARYING SYSTEMS , 1961 .

[48]  Li Liu,et al.  Finite-time stability of linear time-varying singular systems with impulsive effects , 2008, Int. J. Control.

[49]  A. Michel Quantitative analysis of simple and interconnected systems: Stability, boundedness, and trajectory behavior , 1970 .

[50]  E. P. Ryan Singular optimal controls for second-order saturating systems , 1979 .

[51]  K. Poolla,et al.  H ∞ control with transients , 1991 .

[52]  Alan J. Laub,et al.  The LMI control toolbox , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[53]  Ricardo C. L. F. Oliveira,et al.  A BMI approach for ℋ︁∞ gain scheduling of discrete time‐varying systems , 2010 .

[54]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  Rapid Prototyping of Safety System for Nuclear Risks of the ITER Tokamak , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[55]  Zhong-Ping Jiang,et al.  Finite-Time Input-To-State Stability and Applications to Finite-Time Control , 2008 .

[56]  Ricardo C. L. F. Oliveira,et al.  A BMI approach for H ∞ gain scheduling of discrete time-varying systems , 2009 .