A Series Elastic- and Bowden-Cable-Based Actuation System for Use as Torque Actuator in Exoskeleton-Type Robots

Within the context of impedance controlled exoskeletons, common actuators have important drawbacks. Either the actuators are heavy, have a complex structure or are poor torque sources, due to gearing or heavy nonlinearity. Considering our application, an impedance controlled gait rehabilitation robot for treadmill-training, we designed an actuation system that might avoid these drawbacks. It combines a lightweight joint and a simple structure with adequate torque source quality. It consists of a servomotor, a flexible Bowden cable transmission, and a force feedback loop based on a series elastic element. A basic model was developed that is shown to describe the basic dynamics of the actuator well enough for design purpose. Further measurements show that performance is sufficient for use in a gait rehabilitation robot. The demanded force tracking bandwidths were met: 11 Hz bandwidth for the full force range (demanded 4 Hz) and 20 Hz bandwidth for smaller force range (demanded 12 Hz). The mechanical output impedance of the actuator could be reduced to hardly perceptible level. Maxima of about 0.7 Nm peaks for 4 Hz imposed motions appeared, corresponding to less than 2.5% of the maximal force output. These peaks were caused by the stick friction in the Bowden cables. Spring stiffness variation showed that both a too stiff and a too compliant spring can worsen performance. A stiff spring reduces the maximum allowable controller gain. The relatively low control gain then causes a larger effect of stick in the force output, resulting in a less smooth output in general. Low spring stiffness, on the other side, decreases the performance of the system, because saturation will occur sooner.

[1]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[2]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[3]  D. Winter Biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological - 2nd edition , 1991 .

[4]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Performance Measures for Haptic Interfaces , 1996 .

[5]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Parallel-Coupled Micro-Macro Actuators , 1996, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  G.A. Pratt,et al.  Series elastic actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot , 1999, 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399).

[7]  David W. Robinson,et al.  Design and analysis of series elasticity in closed-loop actuator force control , 2000 .

[8]  Chee-Meng Chew,et al.  Virtual Model Control: An Intuitive Approach for Bipedal Locomotion , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Saso Jezernik,et al.  Automatisiertes Lokomotionstraining auf dem Laufband (Automated Locomotor Training on the Treadmill) , 2002 .

[10]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Identification for control: simple process models , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[11]  Thomas G. Sugar A novel selective compliant actuator , 2002 .

[12]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Control law design for haptic interfaces to virtual reality , 2002, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[13]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  G. Visentin,et al.  The ESA Human Arm Exoskeleton for Space Robotics Telepresence , 2003 .

[15]  S. Hesse,et al.  Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[16]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Development and Control of a ‘Soft-Actuated’ Exoskeleton for Use in Physiotherapy and Training , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[17]  G.A. Pratt,et al.  Late motor processing in low-impedance robots: impedance control of series-elastic actuators , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[18]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[19]  C. Richards,et al.  The Role of Technology in Task-Oriented Training in Persons with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2004, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  The RoboKnee: an exoskeleton for enhancing strength and endurance during walking , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[21]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[22]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[23]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design of a series elastic- and Bowden cable-based actuation system for use as torque-actuator in exoskeleton-type training , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[24]  Eduardo Torres-Jara,et al.  A Simple and Scalable Force Actuator , 2005 .

[25]  R. Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.