Bonding of Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidics to Silicon-Based Sensors

We investigate bonding polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to silicon using a thin (∼2 μm) intermediate adhesive layer stamped onto a PDMS piece prior to bonding. In particular, we compare as adhesive layers Sylgard 184 and 182 curing agents and a UV curable adhesive (NOA 75). We examine the effect of both curing temperature and duration on curing agent bond strength. Bond strengths for the different adhesives are determined by measuring the average burst pressure at a PDMS-silicon interface using a PDMS test design. We find that Sylgard 184 curing agent gives the highest bond strength with burst pressure of 700 kPa or more for curing at either 60°C for 3 h, 70°C for 30 min, or 90°C for 20 min. Curing at room temperature takes substantially more time with an average burst pressure of 433 and 555 kPa for curing times of 16 and 27 h, respectively. In comparison, Sylgard 182 curing agent takes 32 h at room temperature to achieve a burst pressure of 289 kPa, while NOA 75 with a 50°C 12 h post-UV exposure bake yields a burst pressure of 125 kPa.

[1]  Robert J. Messinger,et al.  Making it stick: convection, reaction and diffusion in surface-based biosensors , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  J. Berg,et al.  Studies on surface wettability of poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS) and glass under oxygen-plasma treatment and correlation with bond strength , 2005, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[3]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  Weisheng Hu,et al.  Transient deflection response in microcantilever array integrated with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidics. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[5]  B. Stoeber,et al.  The effect of adhesion promoter on the adhesion of PDMS to different substrate materials. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[6]  P. Sheehan,et al.  Detection limits for nanoscale biosensors. , 2005, Nano letters.

[7]  Ryan R. Anderson,et al.  In-plane photonic transduction of silicon-on-insulator microcantilevers. , 2008, Optics express.

[8]  S. Quake,et al.  Multistep Synthesis of a Radiolabeled Imaging Probe Using Integrated Microfluidics , 2005, Science.

[9]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane) , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[10]  Ryan R. Anderson,et al.  Demonstration of microcantilever array with simultaneous readout using an in-plane photonic transduction method. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[11]  Göran Stemme,et al.  A disposable lab-on-a-chip platform with embedded fluid actuators for active nanoliter liquid handling , 2007, Biomedical microdevices.

[12]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Stamp-and-stick room-temperature bonding technique for microdevices , 2005, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[13]  Weisheng Hu,et al.  Sensitivity enhancement of differential splitter-based transduction for photonic microcantilever arrays , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[14]  W. Maszara,et al.  Bonding of silicon wafers for silicon‐on‐insulator , 1988 .