Mind the Gap: Why There Is a Gap Between Information Systems Research and Practice, and How to Manage It

[1]  Boris Otto,et al.  Konsortialforschung , 2010 .

[2]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science Research. Cases , 2020 .

[3]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Publishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success , 2003 .

[4]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[5]  Robert Winter,et al.  Crossing the Line: Overcoming Knowledge Boundaries in Enterprise Transformation , 2015, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[6]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[7]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Special Issue Editorial - Accumulation and Evolution of Design Knowledge in Design Science Research: A Journey Through Time and Space , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Boris Otto,et al.  Relevance through Consortium Research? A Case Study , 2010, ECIS.

[10]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Reflection, Abstraction And Theorizing In Design And Development Research , 2013, ECIS.

[11]  Asbjørn Følstad,et al.  Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[12]  Pervez N. Ghauri,et al.  Research Methods in Business Studies , 2010 .

[13]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Criteria of progress for information systems design theories , 2011, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[14]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Stefan Seidel,et al.  Stimulating dialog between information systems research and practice , 2017, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Robert Winter,et al.  Construction of Situational Information Systems Management Methods , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des..

[17]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[19]  Alexander T. Nicolai,et al.  That’s Relevant! Different Forms of Practical Relevance in Management Science , 2010 .

[20]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[23]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[24]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[25]  Boris Otto,et al.  Relevance through Consortium Research? Findings from an Expert Interview Study , 2010, DESRIST.

[26]  Andrew C. Wicks,et al.  Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-Positivism, and the Search for Ethics , 1998 .

[27]  Robert Winter,et al.  The Evolution of Information Systems Architecture: An Agent-Based Simulation Model , 2020, MIS Q..

[28]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Robert Winter,et al.  Design science research in Europe , 2008 .

[30]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Guy Paré,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..