Effects of schedule pressure on construction performance

Accelerating a project can be rewarding. The consequences, however, can be troublesome if productivity and quality are sacrificed for the sake of remaining ahead of schedule, such that the actual schedule benefits are often barely worth the effort. The tradeoffs and paths of schedule pressure and its causes and effects are often overlooked when schedule decisions are being made. This paper analyses the effects that schedule pressure has on construction performance, and focuses on tradeoffs in scheduling. A research framework has been developed using a causal diagram to illustrate the cause-and-effect analysis of schedule pressure. An empirical investigation has been performed by using survey data collected from 102 construction practitioners working in 38 construction sites in Singapore. The results of this survey data analysis indicate that advantages of increasing the pace of work—by working under schedule pressure—can be offset by losses in productivity and quality. The negative effects of schedule pressure arise mainly by working out of sequence, generating work defects, cutting corners, and losing the motivation to work. The adverse effects of schedule pressure can be minimized by scheduling construction activities realistically and planning them proactively, motivating workers, and by establishing an effective project coordination and communication mechanism.

[1]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Communication problems with ethnic minorities in the construction industry , 2002 .

[2]  H R Thomas SCHEDULE ACCELERATION, WORK FLOW, AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY , 2000 .

[3]  Louis Edward Alfeld Construction Productivity: On-Site Measurement and Management , 1989 .

[4]  David W. Halligan,et al.  Action-Response Model and Loss of Productivity in Construction , 1994 .

[5]  Alexander Laufer,et al.  Motivating Construction Workers , 1982 .

[6]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[7]  Rodney Howes Making governance mechanisms effective in a coordinated industry: the case of construction in the United Kingdom , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[8]  J. W. M Bertrand,et al.  Workload based order release and productivity: a missing link , 2002 .

[9]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  SHIELDING PRODUCTION: ESSENTIAL STEP IN PRODUCTION CONTROL , 1998 .

[10]  Julie Pallant,et al.  SPSS survival manual : a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows , 2001, Behaviour Change.

[11]  Ahmad Hadavi,et al.  Short‐Term Goal Setting for Construction , 1993 .

[12]  T Chamberlain,et al.  THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INSTITUTE , 1990 .

[13]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Dynamic Planning for Fast-Tracking Building Construction Projects , 2001 .

[15]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .