Exploring the Relationship between the Engineering and Physical Sciences and the Health and Life Sciences by Advanced Bibliometric Methods

We investigate the extent to which advances in the health and life sciences (HLS) are dependent on research in the engineering and physical sciences (EPS), particularly physics, chemistry, mathematics, and engineering. The analysis combines two different bibliometric approaches. The first approach to analyze the ‘EPS-HLS interface’ is based on term map visualizations of HLS research fields. We consider 16 clinical fields and five life science fields. On the basis of expert judgment, EPS research in these fields is studied by identifying EPS-related terms in the term maps. In the second approach, a large-scale citation-based network analysis is applied to publications from all fields of science. We work with about 22,000 clusters of publications, each representing a topic in the scientific literature. Citation relations are used to identify topics at the EPS-HLS interface. The two approaches complement each other. The advantages of working with textual data compensate for the limitations of working with citation relations and the other way around. An important advantage of working with textual data is in the in-depth qualitative insights it provides. Working with citation relations, on the other hand, yields many relevant quantitative statistics. We find that EPS research contributes to HLS developments mainly in the following five ways: new materials and their properties; chemical methods for analysis and molecular synthesis; imaging of parts of the body as well as of biomaterial surfaces; medical engineering mainly related to imaging, radiation therapy, signal processing technology, and other medical instrumentation; mathematical and statistical methods for data analysis. In our analysis, about 10% of all EPS and HLS publications are classified as being at the EPS-HLS interface. This percentage has remained more or less constant during the past decade.

[1]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  K. Brner.  Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know , 2010 .

[3]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The neural net of neural network research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[4]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Visualizing Bibliometric Networks , 2014 .

[6]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice , 2014 .

[8]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  An indicator of cross-disciplinary research , 1985, Scientometrics.

[9]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Anthony Rj. Van Raan.  4. The Interdisciplinary Nature of Science: Theoretical Framework and Bibliometric-Empirical Approach , 2000 .

[11]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Toward a consensus map of science , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[14]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  H. P. F. Peters,et al.  Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part I: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling , 1993 .

[16]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Stud , 2012 .

[17]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer , 2011, ArXiv.

[18]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[19]  Diane Rasmussen Neal,et al.  Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinarity. The case of innovation studies in business and management , 2011, ArXiv.

[21]  H. Small,et al.  Identifying emerging topics in science and technology , 2014 .

[22]  A. Raan.  THE NEURAL NET OF NEURAL NETWORK RESEARCH AN EXERCISE IN BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING , 2022 .