Distributed Patterns of Functional Connectivity Predict Working Memory Performance in Novel Healthy and Memory-impaired Individuals

Individual differences in working memory relate to performance differences in general cognitive ability. The neural bases of such individual differences, however, remain poorly understood. Here, using a data-driven technique known as connectome-based predictive modeling, we built models to predict individual working memory performance from whole-brain functional connectivity patterns. Using n-back or rest data from the Human Connectome Project, connectome-based predictive models significantly predicted novel individuals' 2-back accuracy. Model predictions also correlated with measures of fluid intelligence and, with less strength, sustained attention. Separate fluid intelligence models predicted working memory score, as did sustained attention models, again with less strength. Anatomical feature analysis revealed significant overlap between working memory and fluid intelligence models, particularly in utilization of prefrontal and parietal regions, and less overlap in predictive features between working memory and sustained attention models. Furthermore, showing the generality of these models, the working memory model developed from Human Connectome Project data generalized to predict memory in an independent data set of 157 older adults (mean age = 69 years; 48 healthy, 54 amnestic mild cognitive impairment, 55 Alzheimer disease). The present results demonstrate that distributed functional connectivity patterns predict individual variation in working memory capability across the adult life span, correlating with constructs including fluid intelligence and sustained attention.

[1]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Roberto Colom,et al.  Working memory and intelligence , 2003 .

[3]  W. Ma,et al.  Changing concepts of working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Hillary D. Schwarb,et al.  Errors on interrupter tasks presented during spatial and verbal working memory performance are linearly linked to large-scale functional network connectivity in high temporal resolution resting state fMRI , 2015, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[5]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  One-Year Test-Retest Reliability of Intrinsic Connectivity Network fMRI in Older Adults (P03.082) , 2012 .

[6]  Earl K. Miller,et al.  Working Memory Capacity: Limits on the Bandwidth of Cognition , 2015, Daedalus.

[7]  J. Meyers,et al.  Rey complex figure test under four different administration procedures , 1995 .

[8]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[9]  V. Menon,et al.  A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R. Marois,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  Irene E. Nagel,et al.  Human Aging Magnifies Genetic Effects on Executive Functioning and Working Memory , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[12]  J. Jay Todd,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  A taxonomy of external and internal attention. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  E. Vogel,et al.  Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Sang Won Seo,et al.  Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Dementia Version (SNSB-D): A Useful Tool for Assessing and Monitoring Cognitive Impairments in Dementia Patients , 2010, Journal of Korean medical science.

[19]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Brain Connectivity Related to Working Memory Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  Dimitris Samaras,et al.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis of selective representation of visual working memory in ventral temporal and occipital regions , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  Sang Won Seo,et al.  Non-monotonic reorganization of brain networks with Alzheimer's disease progression , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[23]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Connectome-based Models Predict Separable Components of Attention in Novel Individuals , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Monica D. Rosenberg,et al.  Connectome-based models predict attentional control in aging adults , 2019, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Effect of Normal Aging on the Coupling of Neural Activity to the Bold Hemodynamic Response , 1999, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[27]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[29]  M. Chun,et al.  A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Decoding the Contents of Visual Short-Term Memory from Human Visual and Parietal Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  C. Constantinidis,et al.  The neuroscience of working memory capacity and training , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  B. Postle,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Jessica R. Cohen,et al.  The Segregation and Integration of Distinct Brain Networks and Their Relationship to Cognition , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Chun,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Predicts Cognitive Impairment Related to Alzheimer's Disease , 2018, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[36]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Christian J. Fiebach,et al.  Distributed patterns of occipito-parietal functional connectivity predict the precision of visual working memory , 2017, NeuroImage.

[38]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Measuring Working Memory Capacity With Automated Complex Span Tasks , 2012 .

[39]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Desmond,et al.  Neural Substrates of Fluid Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Neocortical Activation during Performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  R. Klatzky Human Memory: Structures And Processes , 1975 .

[42]  Michelle Hampson,et al.  Functional connectivity between task-positive and task-negative brain areas and its relation to working memory performance. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[43]  Martin Ystad,et al.  Subcortical functional connectivity and verbal episodic memory in healthy elderly—A resting state fMRI study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  E. Vogel,et al.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  Saori C. Tanaka,et al.  A prediction model of working memory across health and psychiatric disease using whole-brain functional connectivity , 2017, bioRxiv.

[46]  Raquel E Gur,et al.  Comparison of the continuous performance test with and without working memory demands in healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia , 2001, Schizophrenia Research.

[47]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  R. Henson,et al.  Challenges in measuring individual differences in functional connectivity using fMRI: The case of healthy aging , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[49]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[50]  Siwei Liu,et al.  Carrying the past to the future: Distinct brain networks underlie individual differences in human spatial working memory capacity , 2018, NeuroImage.

[51]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Distributed and Dynamic Storage of Working Memory Stimulus Information in Extrastriate Cortex , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits , 2018, Nature Communications.

[53]  Steven P Reise,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery. , 2015, Neuropsychology.

[54]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! , 1990 .

[55]  J. Morris,et al.  Loss of Intranetwork and Internetwork Resting State Functional Connections with Alzheimer's Disease Progression , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  Robert Leech,et al.  Dynamic network coding of working-memory domains and working-memory processes , 2019, Nature Communications.

[57]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  J. Palva,et al.  Neuronal synchrony reveals working memory networks and predicts individual memory capacity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  J. Jay Todd,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity , 2010 .

[60]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: Evidence from functional MRI , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[61]  Gregor M. Hörzer,et al.  Theta coupling between V4 and prefrontal cortex predicts visual short-term memory performance , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[63]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  A mechanistic model of connector hubs, modularity and cognition , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.

[64]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[65]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[66]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[67]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[68]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[69]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[70]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[71]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[72]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[73]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  A powerful and efficient multivariate approach for voxel-level connectome-wide association studies , 2019, NeuroImage.

[74]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Modulation of Inferotemporal Cortex Activation during Verbal Working Memory Maintenance , 2006, Neuron.

[75]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[76]  Sheng Zhang,et al.  Methylphenidate Modulates Functional Network Connectivity to Enhance Attention , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity predicts neuroticism and extraversion in novel individuals , 2018, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.