Analysis of the IPv4 Address Space Delegation Structure

The Internet has grown tremendously in terms of the number of users who rely on it and the number of organizations that are connected to it. Characterizing how this growth affects its structure and topology is vitally important to determine the fundamental characteristics and limitations that must be handled, such as address space exhaustion; understanding the process of allocating and delegating address space can help to answer these questions. In this paper, we analyze BGP routing data to study the structure and growth of IPv4 address space allocation, fragmentation and usage. We explore the notion of delegation relationships among prefixes and use this information to construct an autonomous system (AS) delegation tree. We show that delegation in the Internet is not significantly correlated to the underlying topology or AS customer-provider relationships. We also analyze the fragmentation and usage of address space over a period of five years and examine prefixes that are delegated by organizations vs. those that are not delegated. We notice that the address space usage due to delegating prefixes is increasing at the same rate as the address space usage due to non-delegating prefixes. This indicates that fragmentation rate of the address space is actually almost a constant with respect to total address usage. Additionally, we show that most delegation is performed by a small number of organizations, which may aid in the implementation of a public-key infrastructure for the Internet.

[1]  George Varghese,et al.  The impact of address allocation and routing on the structure and implementation of routing tables , 2003, SIGCOMM '03.

[2]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[3]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Towards capturing representative AS-level Internet topologies , 2004, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Songwu Lu,et al.  IPv4 address allocation and the BGP routing table evolution , 2005, CCRV.

[5]  kc claffy,et al.  Complexity of global routing policies , 2001 .

[6]  Evi Nemeth,et al.  Internet expansion, refinement and churn , 2002, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[7]  Walter Willinger,et al.  The origin of power laws in Internet topologies revisited , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[8]  kc claffy,et al.  Analysis of RouteViews BGP data: policy atoms , 2001 .

[9]  kc claffy,et al.  Internet topology: connectivity of IP graphs , 2001, SPIE ITCom.

[10]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Measuring ISP topologies with rocketfuel , 2002, TNET.

[11]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  Characterizing Address Use Structure and Stability of Origin Advertisement in Inter-domain Routing , 2006, 11th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC'06).

[12]  Joseph Kee-yin Ng,et al.  Extensions to BGP to Support Secure Origin BGP , 2004 .

[13]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[14]  Lixin Gao.  On inferring autonomous system relationships in the internet , 2001, TNET.

[15]  Daniel Massey,et al.  Collecting the internet AS-level topology , 2005, CCRV.

[16]  Shi Zhou,et al.  Analyzing and modelling the AS-level Internet topology , 2003, ArXiv.

[17]  Stephen T. Kent,et al.  Secure Border Gateway Protocol (S-BGP) , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  Karen Seo,et al.  Public-key infrastructure for the Secure Border Gateway Protocol (S-BGP) , 2001, Proceedings DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition II. DISCEX'01.

[19]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  Origin authentication in interdomain routing , 2003, CCS '03.

[20]  Arnold L. Rosenberg,et al.  Comparing the structure of power-law graphs and the Internet AS graph , 2004, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, 2004. ICNP 2004..

[21]  Randy Bush,et al.  Slowing Routing Table Growth by Filtering Based on Address Allocation Policies , 2001 .