论文信息 - Negotiating Power and Politics in Practitioner Inquiry Communities. - 字舞流文

Negotiating Power and Politics in Practitioner Inquiry Communities.

The extent to which practitioner inquiry groups function as democratic learning communities depends largely on how a facilitator negotiates the group’s power relationships and politics.

Cassandra Drennon

[1] Peter Holly. Action Research: Cul-de-sac or Turnpike?. , 1987 .

[2] T. Rocco,et al. Deconstructing Privilege: An Examination of Privilege in Adult Education , 1998 .

[3] S. Noffke,et al. The Work and Workplace of Teachers in Action Research. , 1992 .

[4] S. Lytle. Invitations to Inquiry: Rethinking Staff Development in Adult Literacy Education. Technical Report TR92-2. , 1992 .

[5] Marilyn Cochran-Smith,et al. Teacher research: the question that persists , 1998 .

[6] E. Tisdell. Poststructural Feminist Pedagogies: The Possibilities and Limitations of Feminist Emancipatory Adult Learning Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[7] Stacey L. Hogan,et al. Planning Responsibly for Adult Education: A Guide to Negotiating Power and Interests , 1994 .

[8] Peter N. Posch,et al. Teachers investigate their work : an introduction to the methods of action research , 1993 .

[9] Ronald M. Cervero,et al. Working the Planning Table: the political practice of adult education , 1998 .

[10] Stephen Kemmis. Action Research and Social Movement , 1993 .

[11] Mary Kay Thompson Tetreault,et al. Learning in the Dark: How Assumptions of Whiteness Shape Classroom Knowledge , 1997 .

[12] Marilyn Cochran-Smith,et al. Interrogating Cultural Diversity: Inquiry and Action , 1992 .

[13] S. Noffke. Chapter 6: Professional, Personal, and Political Dimensions of Action Research , 1997 .