Stabilization of human posture during induced oscillations of the body

SummaryDisplacements of the center of foot pressure, the hip and the head were recorded in six subjects standing on a platform, sinusoidally tilting in pitch(anterior-posterior).Stimulusfrequenciesranged between 0.01 and 1 Hz. Stimulus amplitudes were 2, 4 and 6 °. With eyes open the displacements were minimal at 0.3 Hz. With eyes closed, however, induced sway was maximal at this frequency. The apparent lack of visual stabilization at the lowest frequency (0.01 Hz) might be attributed to a subthreshold velocity of the retinal image motion induced by the swaying body. A similar absence of visual stabilization at 1 Hz is assumed to indicate the limit of the working range of visual stabilization of posture. Independent of stimulus amplitude a phase lead of about 90 ° was found at 0.01 Hz. This decreased with increasing frequency up to a phase lag of 100 ° at the highest frequency (1 Hz). Head stabilization was generally more effective than hip stabilization. EMG recordings from the leg muscles suggest that with eyes closed the center of force is mainly stabilized by leg muscle activity, while with eyes open this stabilization is best, when vision allows for stabilization of body posture by intersegmental movements between head, trunk and legs.

[1]  Gurfinkel' Vs Muscle afferentation and postural control in man. , 1973 .

[2]  K E Popov,et al.  The state of stretch reflex during quiet standing in man. , 1976, Progress in brain research.

[3]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. , 1979, Physiological reviews.

[4]  Lewis Michael Nashner,et al.  Sensory feedback in human posture control , 1970 .

[5]  K H Mauritz,et al.  Postural sway in normals and atactic patients: analysis of the stabilising and destabilizing effects of vision. , 1976, Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression.

[6]  David Burke Muscle spindle function during movement , 1980, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  V. Gurfinkel,et al.  Postural reactions to the controlled sinusoidal displacement of the supporting platform. , 1976, Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression.

[9]  H W Leibowitz,et al.  Peripheral Motion Detection and Refractive Error , 1972, Science.

[10]  D. Tracey,et al.  Joint receptors and the control of movement , 1980, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  R E Poppele,et al.  Comparison between behavior of human and cat muscle spindles recorded in vitro. , 1974, Brain research.

[12]  E. Walsh,et al.  Standing man, slow rhythmic tilting, importance of vision. , 1973, Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression.

[13]  J. Dichgans,et al.  The angle of visual roll motion determines displacement of subjective visual vertical , 1977 .

[14]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .