Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography

Digital mammography is more and more replacing conventional mammography. Initial concerns about an inferior image quality of digital mammography have been largely overcome and recent studies even show digital mammography to be superior in women with dense breasts, while at the same time reducing radiation exposure. Nevertheless, an important limitation of digital mammography remains: namely, the fact that summation may obscure lesions in dense breast tissue. However, digital mammography offers the option of so-called advanced applications, and two of these, contrast-enhanced mammography and tomosynthesis, are promising candidates for improving the detection of breast lesions otherwise obscured by the summation of dense tissue. Two techniques of contrast-enhanced mammography are available: temporal subtraction of images acquired before and after contrast administration and the so-called dual-energy technique, which means that pairs of low/high-energy images acquired after contrast administration are subtracted. Tomosynthesis on the other hand provides three-dimensional information on the breast. The images are acquired with different angulations of the X-ray tube while the object or detector is static. Various reconstruction algorithms can then be applied to the set of typically nine to 28 source images to reconstruct 1-mm slices with a reduced risk of obscuring pathology. Combinations of both advanced applications have only been investigated in individual experimental studies; more advanced software algorithms and CAD systems are still in their infancy and have only undergone preliminary clinical evaluation.

[1]  Serge Muller,et al.  Digital Mammography Using Iodine-Based Contrast Media: Initial Clinical Experience With Dynamic Contrast Medium Enhancement , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Serge Muller,et al.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Rakowski,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[5]  U. Fischer,et al.  Digital mammography: current state and future aspects , 2005, European Radiology.

[6]  U Bick,et al.  Use of Iodine-based Contrast Media in Digital Full-field Mammography - Initial Experience , 2003, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[7]  N Pallikarakis,et al.  A wavelet-based method for removal of out-of-plane structures in digital tomosynthesis. , 1998, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[8]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[9]  Serge Muller,et al.  Development of contrast digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[10]  Idris Elbakri,et al.  Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[11]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  Michael Krumrey,et al.  Monochromatic X-rays in Digital Mammography , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[13]  D. G. Grant Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional radiographic imaging technique. , 1972, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[14]  B. G. Ziedses des Plantes,et al.  Eine Neue Methode Zur Differenzierung in der Rontgenographie (Planigraphies) , 1932 .

[15]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[16]  G. Marchal,et al.  Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen–film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial , 2006, European Radiology.

[17]  John M Lewin,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. , 2003, Radiology.

[18]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[19]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. , 2006, Medical physics.

[20]  Vladimir A. Arkadiev,et al.  Near monochromatic X-rays for digital slot-scan mammography: initial findings , 2004, European Radiology.

[21]  Hans H Schild,et al.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. , 2005, Radiology.

[22]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  New Contrast Media Designed for X-Ray Energy Subtraction Imaging in Digital Mammography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[23]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[24]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography , 2006, European Radiology.

[25]  D. Kopans,et al.  Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[26]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Evaluation of the minimum iodine concentration for contrast-enhanced subtraction mammography. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  John M Boone,et al.  Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques. , 2002, Radiology.

[28]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system , 2006, European Radiology.

[30]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. , 2006, Medical physics.