The impact of time to hemostatic intervention and delayed care for patients with traumatic hemorrhage: A systematic review

Extant literature describes a range of statistically significant relationships between time to intervention and mortality. Despite the dogma of the golden hour, an evidence-informed definition of delayed intervention for bleeding trauma patients at large has not been solidified. BACKGROUND Uncontrolled bleeding is a common cause of preventable mortality in trauma. While it is intuitive that delays to hemostasis may lead to worse outcomes, the impacts of these delays remain incompletely explored. This systematic review aimed to characterize the extant definitions of delayed hemostatic intervention and to quantify the impacts of delays on clinical outcomes. METHODS We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception to August 2022. Studies defining “delayed intervention” and those comparing times to intervention among adults presenting to hospital with blunt or penetrating injuries who required major hemostatic intervention were eligible. The coprimary outcomes were mortality and the definition of delay to hemostasis used. Secondary outcomes included units of packed red blood cells received, length of stay in hospital, and length of stay in intensive care. RESULTS We identified 2,050 studies, with 24 studies including 10,168 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were retrospective observational cohort studies, and most were at high risk of bias. A variety of injury patterns and hemostatic interventions were considered, with 69.6% of studies reporting a statistically significant impact of increased time to intervention on mortality. Definitions of delayed intervention ranged from 10 minutes to 4 hours. Conflicting data were reported for impact of time on receipt of blood products, while one study found a significant impact on intensive care length of stay. No studies assessed length of stay in hospital. CONCLUSION The extant literature is heterogeneous with respect to injuries included, methods of hemostasis employed, and durations of delay examined. While the majority of the included studies demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between time to intervention and mortality, an evidence-informed definition of delayed intervention for bleeding trauma patients at large has not been solidified. In addition, standardized research is needed to establish targets, which could reduce morbidity and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review; Level IV.

[1]  H. W. Chia,et al.  Association between the time to definitive care and trauma patient outcomes: every minute in the golden hour matters , 2021, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[2]  M. Taljaard,et al.  Current practices and challenges in assessing traumatic hemorrhage: An international survey of trauma care providers. , 2021, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[3]  A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Back to the Future: Whole Blood Resuscitation of the Severely Injured Trauma Patient , 2020, Shock.

[4]  Hiroyuki Otsuka,et al.  Impact of a streamlined trauma management approach and determinants of mortality among hemodynamically unstable patients with severe multiple injuries: a before-and-after retrospective cohort study , 2020, Trauma surgery & acute care open.

[5]  B. Joseph,et al.  Angioembolization in intra-abdominal solid organ injury: Does delay in angioembolization affect outcomes? , 2020, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[6]  A. Shintani,et al.  Effect of Earlier Door-to-CT and Door-to-Bleeding Control in Severe Blunt Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[7]  S. Frangos,et al.  Right Place at the Right Time: Thoracotomies at Level I Trauma Centers Have Associated Improved Survival. , 2019, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  G. van Belle,et al.  Earlier time to hemostasis is associated with decreased mortality and rate of complications: Results from the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratio trial. , 2019, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[9]  C. Fu,et al.  Hemostasis as soon as possible? The role of the time to angioembolization in the management of pelvic fracture , 2019, World Journal of Emergency Surgery.

[10]  K. Inaba,et al.  Effect of door-to-angioembolization time on mortality in pelvic fracture: Every hour of delay counts , 2018, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[11]  B. Tilley,et al.  Earlier Endpoints are Required for Hemorrhagic Shock Trials Among Severely Injured Patients , 2017, Shock.

[12]  C. Schulman,et al.  Effect of time to operation on mortality for hypotensive patients with gunshot wounds to the torso: The golden 10 minutes , 2016, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[13]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[14]  V. Convertino,et al.  The Compensatory Reserve For Early and Accurate Prediction Of Hemodynamic Compromise: A Review of the Underlying Physiology , 2016, Shock.

[15]  J. Vincent,et al.  The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition , 2016, Critical Care.

[16]  A. Haq,et al.  Hepatic trauma: effects of delay in presentation , 2016 .

[17]  E. Bulger,et al.  Clinical gestalt and the prediction of massive transfusion after trauma. , 2015, Injury.

[18]  Amechi N. Anazodo,et al.  Early identification of uncontrolled hemorrhage after trauma: Current status and future direction , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[19]  J. Messenger,et al.  Door-to-Balloon Time and Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Primary PCI , 2014 .

[20]  P. Reilly,et al.  Defining the optimal time to the operating room may salvage early trauma deaths , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[21]  Makoto Sera,et al.  Time to pelvic embolization for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures may affect the survival for delays up to 60 min. , 2014, Injury.

[22]  E. Bulger,et al.  Increasing time to operation is associated with decreased survival in patients with a positive FAST examination requiring emergent laparotomy , 2013, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[23]  B. Bouillon,et al.  A critical reappraisal of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock: does it really reflect clinical reality? , 2013, Resuscitation.

[24]  O. Bouamra,et al.  Vital signs and estimated blood loss in patients with major trauma: testing the validity of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock. , 2011, Resuscitation.

[25]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[26]  Michael A Dubick,et al.  Damage control resuscitation: directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[27]  Rolf Lefering,et al.  Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[28]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  Time-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journals. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  Soumitra R. Eachempati,et al.  Factors associated with mortality in patients with penetrating abdominal vascular trauma. , 2002, The Journal of surgical research.

[30]  Lloyd G. Greenwald,et al.  Time to laparotomy for intra-abdominal bleeding from trauma does affect survival for delays up to 90 minutes. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[31]  M. Rosengart,et al.  Prognostic Factors in Patients with Inferior Vena Cava Injuries , 1999, The American surgeon.

[32]  S. Ross,et al.  Traumatic Vascular Disruption in the Thoracocervical Region: Surgical Outcome and Predictors of Survival , 1997 .

[33]  P. Danne,et al.  Laparotomy for trauma in a regional centre: the effect of delay on outcome. , 1994, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[34]  A. Çalışkan,et al.  An evaluation of factors affecting clinical outcomes in penetrating cardiac injuries: A single center experience. , 2017, Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES.

[35]  R. Tesoriero,et al.  Angiographic embolization for hemorrhage following pelvic fracture: Is it “time” for a paradigm shift? , 2017, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[36]  F. Brenneman,et al.  Preventable deaths from hemorrhage at a level I Canadian trauma center. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[37]  T. Madiba,et al.  Predictors of outcome in patients requiring surgery for liver trauma. , 2007, Injury.

[38]  R. Cowley,et al.  Comprehensive regional trauma/Emergency Medical Services (EMS) delivery systems: The United States experience , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.