Infection of Hysterectomized Mice with Chlamydia muridarum and Chlamydia trachomatis

ABSTRACT We studied infection and immunity of hysterectomized mice infected with Chlamydia muridarum and Chlamydia trachomatis to determine if there were differences between these species in their ability to infect vaginal squamous epithelial cells in vivo independently of proximal upper genital tract tissues. We found that C. muridarum readily colonized and infected vaginal squamous epithelial cells, whereas C. trachomatis did not. Primary infection of the vaginal epithelium with C. muridarum produced infections of a duration longer than that reported for normal mice. Infection resulted in an inflammatory response in the vagina characterized by neutrophils and infiltrating submucosal plasma cells consisting primarily of T cells. Despite the delayed clearance, rechallenged C. muridarum-infected mice were highly immune. Mice vaginally infected with C. muridarum produced serum and vaginal wash antibodies and an antigen-specific gamma interferon-dominated Th1-biased T cell response. By comparison, mice vaginally infected with C. trachomatis exhibited transient low-burden infections, produced no detectable tissue inflammatory response, and failed to seroconvert. We discuss how these marked differences in the biology of vaginal infection between these otherwise genetically similar species are possibly linked to pathogen-specific virulence genes and how they may influence pathology and immunity in the upper genital tract.

[1]  David C. Gondek,et al.  A mucosal vaccine against Chlamydia trachomatis generates two waves of protective memory T cells , 2015, Science.

[2]  E. Toh,et al.  Mutational Analysis of the Chlamydia muridarum Plasticity Zone , 2015, Infection and Immunity.

[3]  G. Zhong,et al.  Oviduct Infection and Hydrosalpinx in DBA1/j Mice Is Induced by Intracervical but Not Intravaginal Inoculation with Chlamydia muridarum , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Gail L. Sturdevant,et al.  Murine Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection is unaltered by depletion of CD4+ T cells and diminished adaptive immunity. , 2011, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  H. Caldwell,et al.  Frameshift Mutations in a Single Novel Virulence Factor Alter the In Vivo Pathogenicity of Chlamydia trachomatis for the Female Murine Genital Tract , 2010, Infection and Immunity.

[6]  H. Caldwell,et al.  Chlamydial interferon gamma immune evasion influences infection tropism. , 2007, Current opinion in microbiology.

[7]  S. Morrison,et al.  The Protective Effect of Antibody in Immunity to Murine Chlamydial Genital Tract Reinfection Is Independent of Immunoglobulin A , 2005, Infection and Immunity.

[8]  D. Virok,et al.  Chlamydial IFN-γ immune evasion is linked to host infection tropism , 2005 .

[9]  J. Schripsema,et al.  Histopathologic Changes Related to Fibrotic Oviduct Occlusion After Genital Tract Infection of Mice With Chlamydia muridarum , 2005, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[10]  D. Virok,et al.  Chlamydial IFN-gamma immune evasion is linked to host infection tropism. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H. Caldwell,et al.  Polymorphisms in the Chlamydia trachomatis Cytotoxin Locus Associated with Ocular and Genital Isolates , 2004, Infection and Immunity.

[12]  H. Caldwell,et al.  Immunity to Murine Chlamydial Genital Infection , 2002, Infection and Immunity.

[13]  D. Coonrod.  Chlamydial infections. , 2002, Current women's health reports.

[14]  S. Morré,et al.  Murine Models of Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Tract Infection: Use of Mouse Pneumonitis Strain versus Human Strains , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[15]  S. Morrison,et al.  In Situ Analysis of the Evolution of the Primary Immune Response in Murine Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Tract Infection , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[16]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Genome sequences of Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn and Chlamydia pneumoniae AR39. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  H. Caldwell,et al.  Immunity to Chlamydia trachomatis is mediated by T helper 1 cells through IFN-gamma-dependent and -independent pathways. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[18]  M. Ward,et al.  Genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis fails to induce protective immunity in gamma interferon receptor-deficient mice despite a strong local immunoglobulin A response , 1997, Infection and immunity.

[19]  R. Morrison,et al.  Gene knockout mice establish a primary protective role for major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted responses in Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection , 1995, Infection and immunity.

[20]  H. Caldwell,et al.  CD4+ T cells play a significant role in adoptive immunity to Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the mouse genital tract , 1995, Infection and immunity.

[21]  H. Caldwell,et al.  Immunogenicity of a synthetic oligopeptide corresponding to antigenically common T-helper and B-cell neutralizing epitopes of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. , 1993, Vaccine.

[22]  J. Ito,et al.  Variation in virulence among oculogenital serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis in experimental genital tract infection , 1990, Infection and immunity.

[23]  J. Schachter,et al.  Infertility as a Consequence of Chlamydial Infection of the Upper Genital Tract in Female Mice , 1984, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[24]  D. Taylor-Robinson,et al.  Progesterone as a key factor in the development of a mouse model for genital-tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis , 1981 .

[25]  H. Caldwell,et al.  Purification and partial characterization of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis , 1981, Infection and immunity.

[26]  S. Cohen,et al.  Are chlamydial infections the most prevalent venereal disease? , 1975, JAMA.