Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs

Abstract In this paper, we develop a theory of efficiency and performance tradeoffs for new product development (NPD) projects. Data from 137 completed NPD projects are analyzed for evidence pointing to tradeoffs in performance patterns manifested in the data. In addition, we investigate hypothesized relationships between certain NPD practices and a holistic, efficiency based measure of NPD performance. We demonstrate a new approach to the operationalization of holistic new product development (NPD) project performance, employing a sequential data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology that simultaneously incorporates multiple factors including new product development cost, product cost, product quality, and project lead time. The results of the data analysis support our hypothesis that tradeoffs among NPD performance outcomes are manifested more strongly in highly efficient projects when compared to inefficient projects. The presence of three distinct subgroups in highly efficient projects is suggestive of several modes of efficiency which appear to achieve equally effective market success. The absence of such patterns in less efficient projects supports a theory of performance frontiers that may impose the need for tradeoffs more strongly as NPD projects achieve higher levels of efficiency. The findings also point to the importance of project management experience, balanced management commitment, and cross-functional integration in achieving high levels of NPD project efficiency. We discuss the implications of the findings for practice and for future research.

[1]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  A Framework for Including the Value of Time in Design-for-manufacturing Decision Making , 1993 .

[2]  B. J. Zirger,et al.  The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time , 1996 .

[3]  Michael T. Anthony,et al.  From experience: Balancing the product development process: Achieving product and cycle-time excellence in high-technology industries , 1992 .

[4]  M. Swink.  Threats to new product manufacturability and the effects of development team integration processes , 1999 .

[5]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[6]  A. Meyer,et al.  Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory , 1990 .

[7]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[8]  V. Mitchell,et al.  Using Industrial Key Informants: Some Guidelines , 1994 .

[9]  E. Kessler.  Tightening the belt: methods for reducing development costs associated with new product innovation , 2000 .

[10]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Design-manufacturing integration as a mediator of antecedents to new product design quality , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability , 1995 .

[12]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[13]  J. Beckham.  New product development. , 1985, Hospital forum.

[14]  Yasuhiro Monden,et al.  An empirical study on simultaneous achievement of quality, cost and timing in product development , 2002, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[15]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Time-Cost Trade-Offs in Overlapped Product Development , 2000, Oper. Res..

[16]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Time-cost tradeoffs in uncertain empirical research projects , 1966 .

[17]  R. Calantone,et al.  Controllable Factors of New Product Success: A Cross-National Comparison , 1996 .

[18]  Louis E. Yelle.  THE LEARNING CURVE: HISTORICAL REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY , 1979 .

[19]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[20]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  Technological Level and Product Development Cycle Time , 1999 .

[21]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .

[22]  L. Seiford,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis in the Presence of Both Quantitative and Qualitative Factors , 1996 .

[23]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[24]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[25]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Completing projects on-time: how project acceleration affects new product development , 2003 .

[27]  Rajesh Sethi.  New Product Quality and Product Development Teams , 2000 .

[28]  Eve D. Rosenzweig,et al.  The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers , 2003 .

[29]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[30]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  New product development structures and time-to-market , 1997 .

[31]  W. Souder,et al.  An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D Personnel in new product development projects , 1990 .

[32]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[33]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Applied data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[34]  Patricia Everaert,et al.  Cost targets and time pressure during new product development , 2000 .

[35]  Mushin Lee,et al.  Determinants of technical success in product development when innovative radicalness is considered , 1994 .

[36]  P. Murmann.  Expected development time reductions in the German mechanical engineering industry , 1994 .

[37]  A. Sánchez,et al.  Cooperation and the Ability to Minimize the Time and Cost of New Product Development within the Spanish Automotive Supplier Industry , 2003 .

[38]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept , 2001 .

[39]  P. Sopp.  Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[40]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[41]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation , 1996 .

[42]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[43]  Leo Troy,et al.  Almanac of Business and Industrial Financial Ratios , 1975 .

[44]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A model to evaluate variables impacting the productivity of software maintenance projects , 1991 .

[45]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design , 1997 .

[46]  Abdul Ali,et al.  Product innovativeness and entry strategy: Impact on cycle time and break-even time , 1995 .

[47]  Mohamed A. Youssef.  Design for Manufacturability and Time‐to‐Market, Part 1: Theoretical Foundations , 1994 .

[48]  R. Cooper.  Predevelopment activities determine new product success , 1988 .

[49]  K. Clark.  Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[50]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time, and Effort in Software Product Development , 2000 .

[51]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing Products in Half the Time: New Rules, New Tools, 2nd Edition (Создание новых продуктов за половину времени: новые правила, новые инструменты) , 1997 .

[52]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[53]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[54]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[55]  Ursula Weisenfeld,et al.  Making Trade‐Offs in the New Product Development Process: A German/US Comparison , 1992 .

[56]  M. Swink.  Technological Innovativeness as a Moderator of New Product Design Integration and Top Management Support , 2000 .

[57]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Internal Vs. External Learning In New Product Development: Effects On Speed, Costs And Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[58]  Moren Lévesque,et al.  Effects of funding and its return on product quality in new ventures , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[59]  A. Griffin.  Metrics for Measuring Product Development Cycle Time , 1993 .

[60]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  The Factory as a Learning Laboratory , 2000 .

[61]  David J. Teece,et al.  TIME-COST TRADEOFFS: ELASTICITY ESTIMATES AND DETERMINANTS FOR INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROJECTS , 1977 .

[62]  A. Griffin.  The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time , 1997 .

[63]  Roger Calantone,et al.  Performance and time to market: accelerating cycle time with overlapping stages , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[64]  Jonathan Nook,et al.  ["A Model for New Product Development: An Empirical Test"] , 2007 .

[65]  Douglas W. LaBahn,et al.  New product development cycle time: The influence of project and process factors in small manufacturing companies , 1996 .

[66]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Overlapping Development Activities , 1999 .

[67]  Samuel B. Graves.  Why Costs Increase When Projects Accelerate , 1989 .

[68]  Scott W. O’Leary-Kelly,et al.  THE INTEGRATION OF MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING/SALES DECISIONS: IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2002 .

[69]  R. Schmenner,et al.  On theory in operations management , 1998 .

[70]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Product Development—Faster, On-Time , 2002 .

[71]  J. Linton,et al.  Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio , 2002 .

[72]  B. Bayus.  Speed‐to‐Market and New Product Performance Trade‐offs , 1997 .

[73]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[74]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[75]  John H. Friar,et al.  Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework , 1997 .

[76]  Gyula Vastag,et al.  The theory of performance frontiers , 2000 .

[77]  David G. Mathiasen.  Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth , 1991 .

[78]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A Field Study of Scale Economies in Software Maintenance , 1997 .

[79]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff , 1996 .

[80]  Robin L. Dillon,et al.  Success factors and future challenges in the management of faster-better-cheaper projects: lessons learned from NASA , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[81]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? , 2003 .