Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation

The Technical Committee of Classification and Labelling dealing with harmonized classification of substances and classification criteria under Directive 67/548/EEC on behalf of the European Commission nominated an expert group on skin sensitization in order to investigate further the possibility for potency consideration of skin sensitizers for future development of the classification criteria. All substances and preparations should be classified on the basis of their intrinsic properties and should be labelled accordingly with the rules set up in the Directive 67/548/EEC. The classification should be the same under their full life cycle and in the case that there is no harmonized classification the substance or preparation should be self‐classified by the manufacturer in accordance with the same criteria. The Directive does not apply to certain preparations in the finished state, such as medical products, cosmetics, food and feeding stuffs, which are subject to specific community legislation. The main questions that are answered in this report are whether it would be possible to give detailed guidance on how to grade allergen potency based on the existing methods, whether such grading could be translated into practical thresholds and whether these could be set for both induction and elicitation. Examples are given for substances falling into various potency groups for skin sensitization relating to results from the local lymph node assay, the guinea pig maximization test, the Buehler method and human experience.

[1]  I Kimber,et al.  Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Quantification of chemical peptide reactivity for screening contact allergens: a classification tree model approach. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  A. Gaspari Mechanism of action and other potential roles of an immune response modifier. , 2007, Cutis.

[4]  Carsten Goebel,et al.  Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitization based on sensitization potency data. , 2003, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  J Hilton,et al.  Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. , 1996, Toxicology.

[6]  D A Basketter,et al.  Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[7]  Carl Westmoreland,et al.  A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal , 2006, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[8]  A M Kligman,et al.  The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[9]  Hyung Ok Kim,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis from dodecyldiaminoethyl‐glycine and isopropyl alcohol in a commercial disinfectant swab , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[10]  P. Friedmann,et al.  Sex differences in susceptibility to development of contact hypersensitivity to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) , 1989, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  W. Jordan,et al.  Delayed hypersensitivity in females , 1978, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  Ian Kimber,et al.  The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[13]  I. Kimber,et al.  Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[14]  E. Buehler,et al.  DELAYED CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA PIG. , 1965, Archives of dermatology.

[15]  W Slob,et al.  Comparison of dose-responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay. , 2001, Toxicology.

[16]  I. Kimber,et al.  A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens , 2004, Archives of Toxicology.

[17]  G F Gerberick,et al.  An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  W Slob,et al.  A quantitative method for assessing the sensitizing potency of low molecular weight chemicals using a local lymph node assay: employment of a regression method that includes determination of the uncertainty margins. , 2000, Toxicology.

[19]  K Schneider,et al.  Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays. , 2004, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[20]  G. Patlewicz,et al.  Skin‐sensitization structure‐activity relationships for aldehydes , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  D. Basketter,et al.  Interlaboratory Evaluation of the Local Lymph Node Assay with 25 Chemicals and Comparison with Guinea Pig Test Data , 1991 .

[22]  I Kimber,et al.  A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[23]  I. Kimber,et al.  Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra‐ and inter‐laboratory evaluations , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[24]  J Hilton,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.

[25]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea‐pig data and human experience , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[26]  Paul T. Bailey,et al.  Dose‐response assessments of Kathon® biocide (II) Threshold prophetic patch testing , 1986, Contact dermatitis.

[27]  I Kimber,et al.  Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay. , 1999, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[28]  H. Maibach,et al.  The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: experimental contact sensitization in man. , 1974, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[29]  U N C L A S S I F I E D E N V / M C / C H,et al.  [OECD series on principles of good laboratory practice and compliance monitoring]. , 1997, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[30]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Contact sensitization: A new approach to risk assessment , 1997 .

[31]  Frank Gerberick,et al.  Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[32]  G. R. Thompson,et al.  Citral: A survey of consumer patch-test sensitization. , 1980, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[33]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[34]  S. Shuster,et al.  Quantitation of sensitization and responsiveness to dinitrochlorobenzene in normal subjects. , 1983, The British journal of dermatology.

[35]  J Hilton,et al.  An international evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures. , 1995, Toxicology.

[36]  I Kimber,et al.  Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[37]  D. Gawkrodger,et al.  Occupational contact dermatitis has an appreciable impact on quality of life , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[38]  W S Stokes,et al.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[39]  L. Lai,et al.  Calculating partition coefficient by atom-additive method , 2000 .

[40]  D. Basketter,et al.  Predictive testing in contact all_ergy: facts and future , 2001, Allergy.

[41]  G F Gerberick,et al.  Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in lymph nodes draining the ear following exposure to contact allergens and irritants. , 1996, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[42]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay in practice: a current regulatory perspective , 2006, Human & experimental toxicology.

[43]  D A Basketter,et al.  Contact allergy: the local lymph node assay for the prediction of hazard and risk , 2003, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[44]  Ian Kimber,et al.  A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin‐sensitization testing , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[45]  A. Vølund,et al.  Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy. , 2000, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[46]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Computer-aided knowledge generation for understanding skin sensitization mechanisms: the TOPS-MODE approach. , 2003, Chemical research in toxicology.

[47]  W. Mitchell Sams,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig , 1971 .

[48]  Frank Gerberick,et al.  The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[49]  A. Vølund,et al.  The guinea pig maximization test--with a multiple dose design. , 1995, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[50]  D. Basketter,et al.  Reproducible prediction of contact allergenic potency using the local lymph node assay , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[51]  I Kimber,et al.  Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[52]  Sarfaraz K Niazi Good Laboratory Practices for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies , 2007 .

[53]  S. Seidenari,et al.  Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[54]  I Kimber,et al.  Threshold for classification as a skin sensitizer in the local lymph node assay: a statistical evaluation. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[55]  I Kimber,et al.  Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Toxicology.

[56]  T. Tsuchiya,et al.  Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens. , 1992, Toxicology.

[57]  F. Bérard,et al.  Afferent and efferent phases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) can be induced after a single skin contact with haptens: evidence using a mouse model of primary ACD. , 2003, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[58]  T. Agner,et al.  Contact dermatitis and quality of life: a structured review of the literature , 2003, The British journal of dermatology.

[59]  T. Gray,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial. , 1991, Toxicology letters.

[60]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Kathon biocide: manifestation of delayed contact dermatitis in guinea pigs is dependent on the concentration for induction and challenge. , 1983, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[61]  J. Montelius,et al.  Sensitizing potential in mice, guinea pig and man of the preservative Euxyl® K 400 and its ingredient methyldibromo glutaronitrile , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[62]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[63]  A. Boman,et al.  Guinea pig maximization test. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[64]  I Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[65]  R. Pieters The popliteal lymph node assay in predictive testing for autoimmunity. , 2000, Toxicology letters.

[66]  M. Luster,et al.  Insights into the quantitative relationship between sensitization and challenge for allergic contact dermatitis reactions. , 2002, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[67]  Marzulli Fn,et al.  Contact allergy: predictive testing of fragrance ingredients in humans by Draize and Maximization methods. , 1980, Journal of environmental pathology and toxicology.

[68]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Extrapolating Local Lymph Node Assay EC3 Values To Estimate Relative Sensitizing Potency , 2007, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.