A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis.

The purpose of this study was to develop a new three-dimensional (3D) mimic model of an osseointegrated implant for finite element analysis (FEA) and to evaluate stress distributions in comparison with a model commonly used in most studies as a control. Based on the 3D computer graphic data obtained by serial in vivo bucco-lingual peri-implant bone structure at 75 microm interval in monkey, a mimic FEA model with trabecular structure and a control model with uniform cancellous bone were constructed. A vertical load of 143 N was applied at the top of the implant and induced stress was evaluated at the peri-implant bone. In the mimic model, stress was distributed at both cortical and cancellous bones (1-5 MPa) in bucco-lingual central planes, but concentrated at the cortical crest (3-7 MPa) in the mesio-distal central plane. In contrast, the control model presented stress concentration at the cortical crest around the implant (5-14 MPa), with less stress (0-1 MPa) at the peri-implant cancellous bone in both planes. The findings, that stress distribution at the peri-implant bone were quite different between the mimic and control models, suggest the need to carefully interpret stress distribution in previous studies with models of uniform cancellous peri-implant bone.

[1]  S. Parel,et al.  Tissue-integrated prosthesis. , 1986, The Journal of oral implantology.

[2]  H Tsuru,et al.  The three-dimensional bone interface of an osseointegrated implant: a method for study. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Y Akagawa,et al.  The three-dimensional bone interface of an osseointegrated implant. I: A morphometric evaluation in initial healing. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  J K Lee,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. , 1995, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[5]  T W Korioth,et al.  Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. , 1997, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[6]  V. Goel,et al.  Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  S A Aquilino,et al.  Deflection of superstructure and stress concentrations in the IMZ implant system. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[8]  F. Bosman,et al.  A three-dimensional, finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. , 1993, Archives of oral biology.

[9]  T. Albrektsson Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  K. Tsuga,et al.  The effectiveness of a new algorithm on a three-dimensional finite element model construction of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics. , 1999, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  Y Akagawa,et al.  A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  S C Bayne,et al.  3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[13]  D Pipko,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant. , 1991, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  F. Bosman,et al.  Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure. , 1994, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[15]  K Tsuga,et al.  The effectiveness of element downsizing on a three-dimensional finite element model of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics. , 1999, Journal of oral rehabilitation.