Scientific Opinion on the use of existing environmental surveillance networks to support the post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified plants

Following a request from the European Commission, a set of assessment criteria was developed to support the selection of existing environmental surveillance networks for post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants (GMPs). In compliance with these criteria, some networks and associated programmes were identified as being of potential use subject to further case-by-case analysis. When considering PMEM of GMPs, the approach would also require comparing sites monitored by the networks and the locations where GMPs are cultivated. The reporting of the sites surveyed by networks and locations of cultivated GMPs should thus follow the same standards in order to ensure interoperability and to potentially establish a causal link between a change observed and the GMPs. In this respect, technical support might be required by networks to transform their data records into workable standards. Moreover, the EFSA GMO Panel was asked by the European Commission to examine the sensitivity of statistical analyses used by the networks to detect change. A decision tree is provided for selecting the optimal method for statistical analysis based on the study design and the datasets from networks. Sufficient statistical power needs to be ensured to detect an effect for a particular indicator. Sample size is one of the main contributing factors in determining the power of any network to detect an effect of a product release into the environment. Increasing the sample size implies variable extra-costs depending on whether data are collected by volunteers or professionals. A more powerful statistical analysis can also be achieved by pooling datasets collected by different networks; this needs further investigation because of important covariates leading to differentiated responses. In general, PMEM would benefit from a move towards ‘open data’ policies for re-analysis or pooling data collected by different networks.

[1]  Joachim Schiemann,et al.  Konzept zur Umsetzung eines GVO-Monitoring in Deutschland , 2015 .

[2]  K. Schmidt,et al.  Biometrische Auswertung des Fragebogens zum Monitoring des Anbaus gentechnisch veränderter Maissorten - Statistische Beurteilung von Fragestellungen des GVO-Monitoring , 2015 .

[3]  H. Kroon,et al.  Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations , 2014, Nature.

[4]  G Smets,et al.  The use of existing environmental networks for the post-market monitoring of GM crop cultivation in the EU. , 2014, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[5]  Glandorf Dcm General surveillance of genetically modified plants : Possibilities for implementation in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[6]  A. Lang,et al.  Estimation of required sampling effort for monitoring the possible effects of transgenic crops on butterflies: Lessons from long-term monitoring schemes in Switzerland , 2012 .

[7]  C. Leuschner,et al.  The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable flora , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) ofgenetically modified plants , 2011 .

[9]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants , 2010 .

[10]  J. Schiemann,et al.  Monitoring the commercial cultivation of Bt maize in Europe--conclusions and recommendations for future monitoring practice. , 2009, Environmental biosafety research.

[11]  F. Bigler,et al.  An approach for post‐market monitoring of potential environmental effects of Bt‐maize expressing Cry1Ab on natural enemies , 2009 .

[12]  F. Graef,et al.  GMO monitoring data coordination and harmonisation at EU level – Outcomes of the European Commission Working Group on Guidance Notes supplementing Annex VII of Directive 2001/18/EC , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[13]  A. Gathmann National implementation plan for MON810 monitoring in Germany – A way forward to improve General Surveillance? , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[14]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Choice of units of analysis and modeling strategies in multilevel hierarchical models , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[15]  Kerstin Schmidt,et al.  Monitoring des Anbaus gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen - Fragebögen zur Datenerhebung bei Landwirten , 2004 .

[16]  Joachim Schiemann,et al.  Concept for the Realisation of a GMO Monitoring in Germany , 2003 .

[17]  J. Pannekoek,et al.  Indexing European bird population trends using results of national monitoring schemes: a trial of a new method , 2001 .