TARGET ARTICLE SAL: an explicitly pluralistic cognitive architecture

The SAL cognitive architecture is a synthesis of two well-established constituents: ACT-R, a hybrid symbolic-subsymbolic cognitive architecture, and Leabra, a neural architecture. These component architectures have vastly different origins yet suggest a surprisingly convergent view of the brain, the mind and behaviour. Furthermore, both of these architectures are internally pluralistic, recognising that models at a single level of abstraction cannot capture the required richness of behaviour. In this article, we offer a brief principled defence of epistemological pluralism in cognitive science and artificial intelligence, and elaborate on the SAL architecture as an example of how pluralism can be highly effective as an approach to research in cognitive science.

[1]  C. Stark,et al.  Pattern Separation in the Human Hippocampal CA3 and Dentate Gyrus , 2008, Science.

[2]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A Connectionist Implementation of the ACT-R Production System , 2008 .

[3]  C. Lebiere,et al.  Procedural Learning and Sequential Control of Behavior in a Neural Network Model of the Basal Ganglia , 2008 .

[4]  John R. Anderson,et al.  How Can the Human Mind Occur , 2007 .

[5]  Thomas E. Hazy,et al.  PVLV: the primary value and learned value Pavlovian learning algorithm. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  On the Control of Control: The Role of Dopamine in Regulating Prefrontal Function and Working Memory , 2007 .

[7]  David J. Jilk,et al.  Attentional Blink: An Internal Traffic Jam , 2007 .

[8]  R. O’Reilly.  Biologically Based Computational Models of High-Level Cognition , 2006, Science.

[9]  Dario D. Salvucci.  Modeling Driver Behavior in a Cognitive Architecture , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Making Working Memory Work: A Computational Model of Learning in the Prefrontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia , 2006, Neural Computation.

[11]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  Cognitive Agents Interacting in Real and Virtual Worlds , 2005 .

[12]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and flexible cognitive control: rules without symbols. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Using Computational Cognitive Modeling to Diagnose Possible Sources of Aviation Error , 2005 .

[14]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[15]  B. Bontempi,et al.  Sites of Neocortical Reorganization Critical for Remote Spatial Memory , 2004, Science.

[16]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning Real-time Over-the-shoulder Instructions in a Dynamic Task , 2004, ICCM.

[17]  J. Sanes,et al.  LTP: perils and progress , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  David J. Jilk,et al.  Effectiveness of Neural Network Learning Rules Generated by a Biophysical Model of Synaptic Plasticity , 2003 .

[19]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.6 No.12 December 2002 , 2022 .

[20]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Spanning seven orders of magnitude: a challenge for cognitive modeling , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function. , 2001, Psychological review.

[23]  John R. Anderson,et al.  What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems , 2001 .

[24]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain , 2000 .

[25]  R. O’Reilly.  Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[27]  Stefan Wermter,et al.  A Novel Modular Neural Architecture for Rule-Based and Similarity-Based Reasoning , 1998, Hybrid Neural Systems.

[28]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[29]  Randall C. O'Reilly,et al.  Biologically Plausible Error-Driven Learning Using Local Activation Differences: The Generalized Recirculation Algorithm , 1996, Neural Computation.

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[31]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[32]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[33]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[34]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project , 1990 .

[35]  F. Rohrlich.  Pluralistic Ontology and Theory Reduction in the Physical Sciences , 1988, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[36]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[37]  John R. Anderson.  Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[38]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[39]  Allen Newell,et al.  Production Systems: Models of Control Structures , 1973 .

[40]  Allen Newell,et al.  A theoretical exploration of mechanisms for coding the stimulus , 1972 .

[41]  R. Feynman.  The Character of Physical Law , 1965 .

[42]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[43]  K. Freeman,et al.  Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers , 1983 .