Establishing an electronic health record–supported approach for outreach to and recruitment of persons at high risk of type 2 diabetes in clinical trials: The vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study experience

Aims To establish recruitment approaches that leverage electronic health records in multicenter prediabetes/diabetes clinical trials and compare recruitment outcomes between electronic health record–supported and conventional recruitment methods. Methods Observational analysis of recruitment approaches in the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study, a multicenter trial in participants with prediabetes. Outcomes were adoption of electronic health record–supported recruitment approaches by sites, number of participants screened, recruitment performance (proportion screened who were randomized), and characteristics of participants from electronic health record–supported versus non–electronic health record methods. Results In total, 2423 participants were randomized: 1920 from electronic health record (mean age of 60 years, 41% women, 68% White) and 503 from non–electronic health record sources (mean age of 56.9 years, 58% women, 61% White). Electronic health record–supported recruitment was adopted by 21 of 22 sites. Electronic health record–supported recruitment was associated with more participants screened versus non–electronic health record methods (4969 vs 2166 participants screened), higher performance (38.6% vs 22.7%), and more randomizations (1918 vs 505). Participants recruited via electronic health record were older, included fewer women and minorities, and reported higher use of dietary supplements. Electronic health record–supported recruitment was incorporated in diverse clinical environments, engaging clinicians either at the individual or the healthcare system level. Conclusion Establishing electronic health record–supported recruitment approaches across a multicenter prediabetes/diabetes trial is feasible and can be adopted by diverse clinical environments.

[1]  W. Cefalu,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 Abridged for Primary Care Providers , 2018, Clinical Diabetes.

[2]  A. Doorenbos,et al.  Indications of Recruitment Challenges in Research with U.S. Military Service Members: A ClinicalTrials.gov Review. , 2017, Military medicine.

[3]  D. Mori,et al.  Targeted Recruitment of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes for a Physical Activity Intervention , 2015, Diabetes Spectrum.

[4]  Tim Ramsay,et al.  Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: An empirical analysis of recently closed trials , 2015, Clinical trials.

[5]  J. Ware,et al.  Rationale and Design of the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) Study: A Diabetes Prevention Trial , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[6]  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al.  Evaluation of data completeness in the electronic health record for the purpose of patient recruitment into clinical trials: a retrospective analysis of element presence , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[7]  Shaun Treweek,et al.  Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, BMJ Open.

[8]  V. Basevi Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[9]  Chunhua Weng,et al.  Case Report: Electronic Screening Improves Efficiency in Clinical Trial Recruitment , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  E. Fisher,et al.  The Diabetes Prevention Program: recruitment methods and results. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.