Using NEXRAD and rain gauge precipitation data for hydrologic calibration of SWAT in a Northeastern watershed.

The value of watershed-scale, hydrologic and water quality models to ecosystem management is increasingly evident as more programs adopt these tools to evaluate the effectiveness of different management scenarios and their impact on the environment. Quality of precipitation data is critical for appropriate application of watershed models. In small watersheds, where no dense rain gauge network is available, modelers are faced with a dilemma to choose between different data sets. In this study, we used the German Branch (GB) watershed (~50 km2), which is included in the USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP), to examine the implications of using surface rain gauge and next-generation radar (NEXRAD) precipitation data sets on the performance of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The GB watershed is located in the Coastal Plain of Maryland on the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. Stream flow estimation results using surface rain gauge data seem to indicate the importance of using rain gauges within the same direction as the storm pattern with respect to the watershed. In the absence of a spatially representative network of rain gauges within the watershed, NEXRAD data produced good estimates of stream flow at the outlet of the watershed. Three NEXRAD datasets, including (1) non-corrected (NC), (2) bias-corrected (BC), and (3) inverse distance weighted (IDW) corrected NEXRAD data, were produced. Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients for daily stream flow simulation using these three NEXRAD data ranged from 0.46 to 0.58 during calibration and from 0.68 to 0.76 during validation. Overall, correcting NEXRAD with rain gauge data is promising to produce better hydrologic modeling results. Given the multiple precipitation datasets and corresponding simulations, we explored the combination of the multiple simulations using Bayesian model averaging. The results show that this Bayesian scheme can produce better deterministic prediction than any single simulation and can provide reasonable uncertainty estimation. The optimal water balance obtained in this study is an essential precursor to acquiring realistic estimates of sediment and nutrient loads in future GB modeling efforts. The results presented in this study are expected to provide insights into selecting precipitation data for watershed modeling in small Coastal Plain catchments.

[1]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  GIS‐Based Spatial Precipitation Estimation: A Comparison of Geostatistical Approaches 1 , 2009 .

[2]  A. Raftery,et al.  Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles , 2005 .

[3]  Thomas Meixner,et al.  A global and efficient multi-objective auto-calibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models , 2007 .

[4]  Hongjie Xie,et al.  Validating NEXRAD MPE and Stage III precipitation products for uniform rainfall on the Upper Guadalupe River Basin of the Texas Hill Country , 2008 .

[5]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[6]  Laurent Delobbe,et al.  Evaluation of radar-gauge merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimates , 2009 .

[7]  Frederick Bloetscher,et al.  Comparison of NEXRAD and Rain Gauge Precipitation Measurements in South Florida , 2009 .

[8]  D. N. Moriasi,et al.  Spatial resolution effect of precipitation data on SWAT calibration and performance: implications for CEAP. , 2009 .

[9]  David R. Legates,et al.  The Accuracy of United States Precipitation Data , 1994 .

[10]  L. Joseph Bachman,et al.  Ground-water discharge and base-flow nitrate loads of nontidal streams, and their relation to a hydrogeomorphic classification of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, middle Atlantic Coast , 1998 .

[11]  E. L. Neff How much rain does a rain gage gage , 1977 .

[12]  WSR-88 D Radar Rainfall Estimation : Capabilities , Limitations and Potential Improvements , 2009 .

[13]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[14]  Kenneth J. Tobin,et al.  Using SWAT to Model Streamflow in Two River Basins With Ground and Satellite Precipitation Data 1 , 2009 .

[15]  Emad Habib,et al.  Validation of NEXRAD multisensor precipitation estimates using an experimental dense rain gauge network in south Louisiana. , 2009 .

[16]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Evaluating NEXRAD Multisensor Precipitation Estimates for Operational Hydrologic Forecasting , 2000 .

[17]  Ioannis K. Tsanis,et al.  A comparative analysis of rain-gauge and radar techniques for storm kinematics , 2002 .

[18]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Comparison of raingage and WSR-88D Stage III precipitation data over the Texas-Gulf basin , 2004 .

[19]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  STREAM FLOW ESTIMATION USING SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL IN THE TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TEXAS , 2004 .

[20]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm , 1998 .

[21]  G. Austin,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF A MOVING RAINSTORM ON DIRECT RUNOFF PROPERTIES1 , 1984 .

[22]  Emad Habib,et al.  Hydrologic Modeling with NEXRAD Precipitation in Middle Tennessee , 2004 .

[23]  Mohamed M. Hantush,et al.  Hydrologic Modeling of an Eastern Pennsylvania Watershed with NEXRAD and Rain Gauge Data , 2006 .

[24]  J. Arnold,et al.  Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management , 2005 .

[25]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging , 2009 .

[26]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The influence of storm movement on water erosion: storm direction and velocity effects , 2003 .

[27]  Steven T. Bednarz,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART II: MODEL APPLICATION 1 , 1998 .

[28]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Formulation of a hybrid calibration approach for a physically based distributed model with NEXRAD data input , 2004 .

[29]  Chandra S. Pathak,et al.  Development and Use of a NEXRAD Database for Water Management in South Florida , 2003 .

[30]  Jay P. Breidenbach,et al.  Real-Time Correction of Spatially Nonuniform Bias in Radar Rainfall Data Using Rain Gauge Measurements , 2002 .

[31]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Effect of the direction of storm movement on planar flow , 1998 .

[32]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Multisensor Precipitation Reanalysis , 2010 .