Title Multivariable approach to determine treatment efficiencyof wetland : size effect and electrokinetic effects

Empirical stochastic multi-variable models for prediction of treatment efficiency of wetlands are presented in this article. Wetlands of seven different shapes are visualized using tracer studies. Two different variants of experiments are carried out. Numerous flow rate variations are performed keeping surface area of the wetland constant. The experiment is also carried out with a variation in volume of the wetland which helps to study the effect of flow height on the hydrodynamics within the wetland. A multi-variable model for treatment efficiency in terms of change in tracer concentration as a function of shape, volumetric height of water within the wetland, time, and mass flow rate is considered. Further, another set of experiments is performed studying the treatment efficiency in terms of electro-kinetic parameters. This involves measuring the pH, turbidity, temperature, electrical conductivity, total dissolved salts at inlet and outlet and residence time with varying flow rate, and height of water for the seven different wetland models under study. The electro-kinetic parameters changes due to difference in concentration of the tracer dye which simulates impurities. In this case, treatment efficiency is expressed as a function of the above-discussed electro-kinetic variables, time variation, water height, as well as variation in the mass flow rate. The stochastic multi-parameter models, thus, empirically derived in the above two cases have high coefficient of determination. The models thus derived may be used as a tool for quick analysis of treatment efficiency of any shape and size of a three-dimensional wetland.

[1]  Chad J Boeckman Spatial and Seasonal Variability in the Water Quality Characteristics of an Ephemeral Wetland , 2015 .

[2]  Larry C. Brown,et al.  Simplified residence time prediction models for constructed wetland water recycling systems , 2013 .

[3]  J. Lienhard,et al.  Costs for water supply, treatment, end-use and reclamation , 2013 .

[4]  John H. Lienhard,et al.  Energy requirements for water production, treatment, end use, reclamation, and disposal , 2012 .

[5]  M. Field Application of robust statistical methods to background tracer data characterized by outliers and left-censored data. , 2011, Water research.

[6]  Larry C. Brown,et al.  Quantifying the hydraulic performance of treatment wetlands using the moment index. , 2010 .

[7]  M. Ariffin,et al.  Treatment of industrial wastewater using constructed wetland : removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total suspended solid (TSS) , 2009 .

[8]  A. Wörman,et al.  Controlling factors for water residence time and flow patterns in Ekeby treatment wetland, Sweden , 2007 .

[9]  Darrin B. Stairs Flow characteristics of constructed wetlands : tracer studies of the hydraulic regime , 1993 .

[10]  William J. Mitsch,et al.  Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural , 1990 .

[11]  A. Plappally Theoretical and Empirical Modeling of Flow, Strength, Leaching and Micro-Structural Characteristics of V Shaped Porous Ceramic Water Filters , 2010 .

[12]  R. Kadlec,et al.  Conducting hydraulic tracer studies of constructed wetlands: a practical guide , 2007 .

[13]  Tony Hoong Fatt Wong,et al.  Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds , 1999 .

[14]  P. Lemke,et al.  Metal removal efficiencies from acid mine drainage in the Big Five constructed wetland. , 1990 .