E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda

Abstract Among the defining purposes of e-Government, highly agile, citizen-centric, accountable, transparent, effective, and efficient government operations and services have high rank. For reaching these goals, the integration of government information resources and processes, and ultimately, the interoperation of independent e-Government information systems appears essential. Yet, most integration and interoperation efforts meet serious challenges and constraints. This article contributes to the development of a research framework on integration and system interoperation in e-Government. We propose future research projects to study the foci and purposes, limitations and constraints, as well as processes and outcomes of integration and interoperation in electronic Government. For so doing, we suggest needs-and-wants theory as one promising theoretical lens (among others) for guiding that effort.

[1]  Michael Schrefl,et al.  Integration of Web services into workflows through a multi-level schema architecture , 2002, Proceedings Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Issues of E-Commerce and Web-Based Information Systems (WECWIS 2002).

[2]  R. Fisher.  Needs Theory, Social Identity and an Eclectic Model of Conflict , 1990 .

[3]  Michele Colajanni,et al.  A performance study of distributed architectures for the quality of Web services , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Mary Roth,et al.  Information integration: A new generation of information technology , 2002, IBM Syst. J..

[5]  Tullio Vernazza,et al.  Components and data-flow applied to the integration of Web services , 2001, IECON'01. 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Cat. No.37243).

[6]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Applying Stakeholder Theory to e-Government - Benefits and Limits , 2001, I3E.

[7]  Wolfgang Emmerich,et al.  Web service interfaces for inter-organisational business processes an infrastructure for automated reconciliation , 2002, Proceedings. Sixth International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing.

[8]  Idabc.  European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services , 2004 .

[9]  Scott Mitchell,et al.  A comparison of the strategic priorities of public and private sector information resource management executives , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  An Overview of DC-Based e-Government Metadata Standards and Initiatives , 2004, EGOV.

[11]  H. Fallding.  The Social Process Revisited: Achieving Human Interests Through Alliance and Opposition , 1990 .

[12]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[13]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Constitutional principles and E-government: an opinion about possible effects of Federalism and the separation of powers on E-government policies , 2002, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Derek Werthmuller,et al.  Bridging the Enterprise: Lessons from the New York State-Local Internet Gateway Prototype , 2004 .

[15]  T. M. Chester.  Cross-platform integration with XML and SOAP , 2001 .

[16]  William E. Moen.  Interoperability for information access: technical standards and policy considerations 10 10 Edited , 2000 .

[17]  Herbert Van de Sompel,et al.  A Spectrum of Interoperability: The Site for Science Prototype for the NSDL , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[18]  Peter H. Grinyer,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Structure: A Critical Replication , 1980 .

[19]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  The impact of enterprise application integration on information system lifecycles , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[20]  C. Alderfer.  Existence, Relatedness, and Growth; Human Needs in Organizational Settings , 1972 .

[21]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[22]  Johan Galtung,et al.  Human needs: A contribution to the current debate , 1980 .

[23]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Digital libraries , 1995, CACM.

[24]  Hans Jochen Scholl.  E-Government-Induced Business Process Change (BPC): An Empirical Study of Current Practices , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[25]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[26]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Beyond Technical Interoperability - Introducing a Reference Model for Measures of Merit for Coalition Interoperability , 2003 .

[27]  P. Aucoin,et al.  The Centralization-Decentralization Conundrum: Organization and Management in the Canadian Government , 1988 .

[28]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  Understanding Interorganizational Cooperation: Public-Private Collaboration in Regulating Financial Market Innovation , 2001 .

[29]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  Understanding and Modelling Flexibility in Administrative Processes , 2002, EGOV.

[30]  M. Clark.  Meaningful Social Bonding as a Universal Human Need , 1990 .

[31]  Roland Traunmüller,et al.  Integration - The Next Challenge in e-Government , 2001 .

[32]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. , 1977 .

[33]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes , 1993 .

[34]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[35]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  Information Integration or Process Integration? How to Achieve Interoperability in Administration , 2004, EGOV.

[36]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy , 1988 .

[37]  R. Brugha,et al.  A stakeholder analysis. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[38]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Public management information systems: theory and prescription , 1986 .

[39]  Hans Schollhammer,et al.  Organization Structures of Multinational Corporations , 1971 .

[40]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Interoperability in E-Government: More than Just Smart Middleware , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[42]  Blair Jd,et al.  Too many on the seesaw: stakeholder diagnosis and management for hospitals. , 1988, Hospital & health services administration.

[43]  Herbert Kubicek,et al.  Methodology for Analysing the Relationship between the Reorganisation of the Back Office and Better Electronic Public Services , 2003, EGOV.

[44]  J. Sayah.  Web services: enabling business integration and collaboration , 2002, Proceedings Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Issues of E-Commerce and Web-Based Information Systems (WECWIS 2002).

[45]  S. Dawes.  Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks , 1996 .

[46]  J. Burton,et al.  Conflict: Human Needs Theory , 1990, The Conflict Series.

[47]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[48]  Luis Guijarro,et al.  Analysis of the Interoperability Frameworks in e-Government Initiatives , 2004, EGOV.

[49]  Robert W. Backoff,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Organizations , 1976 .

[50]  J. Child.  Predicting and Understanding Organization Structure. , 1973 .

[51]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[52]  L. Doyal,et al.  A Theory of Human Need , 1991 .

[53]  Dan Foley,et al.  Mapping and Converting Essential Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Metadata into MARC21 and Dublin Core: Towards an Alternative to the FGDC Clearinghouse , 2000, D Lib Mag..

[54]  J. Child.  Organization Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study , 1972 .

[55]  H. Berman,et al.  A short history of Western legal theory , 1992 .

[56]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  H. Scholl.  Involving Salient Stakeholders , 2004 .

[58]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Walking atop the cliffs: avoiding failure and reducing risk in large scale e-government projects , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[59]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[60]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF MOTIVE ACQUISITION. , 1965, The American psychologist.

[61]  R. Zmud.  Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[62]  Jeffrey W. Seifert,et al.  A Primer on E-Government: Sectors, Stages, Opportunities, and Challenges of Online Governance , 2003 .

[63]  John Child,et al.  The Aston Group Findings on Centralization: Further Discussion , 1975 .

[64]  C. Alderfer,et al.  A Critique of Salancik and Pfeffer's Examination of Need-Satisfaction Theories , 1977 .

[65]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[66]  R. Fisher,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in , 1981 .

[67]  Thomas J. Mowbray,et al.  The essential CORBA - systems integration using distributed objects , 1995 .