Spray vaporization in nonpremixed turbulent combustion modeling: a single droplet model

Abstract The injection of liquid fuel is a common procedure in turbulent combustion devices operating in the nonpremixed regime. Various numerical models may be found in the literature to calculate such turbulent flames, using either Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes techniques (RANS) or large eddy simulation (LES). The typical inputs of nonpremixed turbulent combustion modeling are the mean and the fluctuations of the mixture fraction. In computational fluid dynamics codes, the mean source of mixture fraction may be provided by Euler-Lagrange spray modeling. However, the sources of fluctuations of mixture fraction due to vaporization require more closures. Direct numerical simulation (DNS) provides a way of estimating these sources and, using DNS of droplets evaporating in a turbulent flow, it is described how they play an important role in the time evolution of fuel/air mixing in a dilute spray. The statistical properties of the spray and of the scalar field are analyzed to propose a single droplet model (SDM) to evaluate these sources. SDM calculates mean values of the Eulerian source of fuel conditioned on the mixture fraction.

[1]  D. Veynante,et al.  Direct numerical simulations analysis of flame surface density models for nonpremixed turbulent combustion , 1998 .

[2]  P. Moin,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION: A Tool in Turbulence Research , 1998 .

[3]  Luc Vervisch,et al.  Surface density function in premixed turbulent combustion modeling, similarities between probability density function and flame surface approaches , 1995 .

[4]  H. Chiu,et al.  Internal group combustion of liquid droplets , 1982 .

[5]  P. Givi Model-free simulations of turbulent reactive flows , 1989 .

[6]  L. Vervisch,et al.  Modeling non-premixed turbulent combustion in aeronautical engines using PDF-generator , 1998 .

[7]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  Fundamental Aspects of Combustion , 1963, Nature.

[8]  S. Elghobashi,et al.  Direct simulation of particle dispersion in a decaying isotropic turbulence , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Robert W. Bilger Turbulent diffusion flames , 1989 .

[10]  G. Faeth Evaporation and combustion of sprays , 1983 .

[11]  Chung King Law,et al.  Recent advances in droplet vaporization and combustion , 1982 .

[12]  T. Poinsot,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF NON-PREMIXED TURBULENT FLAMES , 1998 .

[13]  Nedunchezhian Swaminathan,et al.  Assessment of combustion submodels for turbulent nonpremixed hydrocarbon flames , 1999 .

[14]  K. Kuo Principles of combustion , 1986 .

[15]  F. Williams,et al.  Turbulent Reacting Flows , 1981 .

[16]  C. Dopazo,et al.  A geometric/kinematic interpretation of scalar mixing , 1999 .

[17]  W. Kollmann The pdf approach to turbulent flow , 1990 .

[18]  S. Pope PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows , 1985 .

[19]  Robert W. Bilger,et al.  Conditional moment closure for turbulent reacting flow , 1993 .

[20]  S. Lele Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution , 1992 .

[21]  S. Pope,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of the turbulent mixing of a passive scalar , 1988 .

[22]  W. Sirignano Fuel droplet vaporization and spray combustion theory , 1983 .

[23]  C. Crowe,et al.  The Particle-Source-In Cell (PSI-CELL) Model for Gas-Droplet Flows , 1977 .

[24]  C. Pierce,et al.  LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF A CONFINED COAXIAL JET WITH SWIRL AND HEAT RELEASE , 1998 .