Type and frequency of healthcare encounters can predict poor surgical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients

BACKGROUND Several challenges are associated with collecting clinically meaningful post-operative outcomes. The widespread implementation of electronic medical records (EMR) offers a new opportunity to evaluate surgical outcomes using routinely collected data in these systems. This study evaluated whether surgical outcomes can be ascertained from EMR's hospital and outpatient encounters. Specifically, we evaluated anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR) outcomes. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of 6985 ACLRs performed between 2/2005-9/2012 was conducted. Patient encounters during days 1-90 and days 91-180 after ACLR surgery were the exposures of interest. Nine hospital and eight outpatient encounter types were evaluated. The main endpoint of the study was revision surgery six months after ACLR. RESULTS The cohort was 66.7% male, the mean age was 28 (standard deviation=11) years-old, and the incidence of revision was 1.5% (n=105). After adjustments, in days 1-90 post-ACLR, compared to patients with 0-4 orthopedic office visits, patients with 5-9 (hazard ratio (HR)=9.9, 95% confidence interval(CI), 4.3-23.2) and those with 10 or more (HR=13.8, 95%CI, 5.6-33.8) visits had a higher risk of revision. In days 91-180, patients with any outpatient hospital encounters (HR=2.5, 95%CI 1.4-4.5) had a higher risk of revision than patients without visits. Additionally, patients with 4-5 regular office visits (HR=3.8 times, 95%CI, 2.0-7.0) had a higher risk of revision surgery than those with 0-1 visits. DISCUSSION The number of post-operative outpatient visits was associated with ACLR revision surgery. Using EMR encounters to assess surgical outcomes is a viable option for monitoring ACLR patients. The simple assessment of visit types and number of encounters alone can provide valuable information regarding the normal course of rehabilitation of a surgical patient and possible deviation from this normal course. In large cohorts of patients, this type of patient surveillance can assist surgeons with monitoring their patients.

[1]  Michael K Gould,et al.  Sociodemographic characteristics of members of a large, integrated health care system: comparison with US Census Bureau data. , 2012, The Permanente journal.

[2]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Activity Rating Scale for Disorders of the Knee , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  M. Majewski,et al.  Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: A 10-year study. , 2006, The Knee.

[4]  R. Cebul,et al.  Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M. Inacio,et al.  Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness. , 2013, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[6]  S. Brunak,et al.  Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[7]  Stephen Lyman,et al.  Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  Associations between inadequate knee function detected by KOOS and prospective graft failure in an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee , 2015, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  M. Inacio,et al.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: association of graft choice with increased risk of early revision. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[10]  G. Oster,et al.  Resource utilization and costs before and after total joint arthroplasty , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[11]  I. McNamara,et al.  Is reconstruction the best management strategy for anterior cruciate ligament rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus non-operative treatment. , 2014, The Knee.

[12]  Robert H Brook,et al.  A Comparison of Clinical Registry Versus Administrative Claims Data for Reporting of 30-Day Surgical Complications , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[13]  R. Deyo,et al.  Trends in Health Care Expenditures, Utilization, and Health Status Among US Adults With Spine Problems, 1997–2006 , 2009, Spine.

[14]  M. Inacio,et al.  Analysis of 16,192 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions From a Community-Based Registry , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  I. Kohane.  Using electronic health records to drive discovery in disease genomics , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  J. Agel,et al.  Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. , 2007, Journal of athletic training.

[17]  Michael D. Lewek,et al.  A systematic review of evidence for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: how much and what type? , 2004 .

[18]  I. Serrano-Pedraza,et al.  Complications following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the English NHS. , 2012, The Knee.

[19]  Jane M Blazeby,et al.  IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage , 2013, BMJ.

[20]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. , 2009, Health affairs.

[21]  Brian R Wolf,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010. , 2012, JAMA.

[22]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[23]  R. Marx,et al.  Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomes. , 2010, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[24]  A. Carr,et al.  Review of clinical outcomes-based anchors of minimum clinically important differences in hip and knee registry-based reports and publications. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  D. Ogilvie-Harris,et al.  Risk factors for Recurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Population Study in Ontario, Canada with 5-year Follow-up , 2013, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine.

[26]  D. Ogilvie-Harris,et al.  Risk factors for Recurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Population Study in Ontario, Canada with 5-year Follow-up , 2013, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine.

[27]  P. Ravaud,et al.  Current state of anterior cruciate ligament registers. , 2014, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.