Modelling the barriers to blockchain implementation in human resource function

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to explore and analyse the challenges in effective implementation of blockchain by human resource management (HRM) functions. This paper also aims to assess the interplay between the barriers in causing the challenges during blockchain execution.Design/methodology/approachTen barriers are discovered from the past studies. Based on the expert views on the identified barriers interpretive structural modelling (ISM) is administered to understand the interplay of these 10 challenges resulting in ineffective or non-implementation of HR blockchain.FindingsThe application of ISM has helped in categorizing the variables into strategic, operational and performance outcomes. Results of ISM indicate key barriers like lack of expertise, data privacy, technical infeasibility, complexity in implantation and lack of used cases.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is limited to 10 barriers. There can be other barriers that can also be studied. Second, the research is proposing a conceptual model that needs further validation.Practical implicationsThis paper has significant implications for the theoretical and practical body of knowledge. So far, most studies are exploring and describing HRM from a digital perspective. Most HR studies are on artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things and smart HRM. Previous studies on blockchain for HRM are mostly describing the advantages of going for it.Social implicationsBased on the findings, it can also be suggested that policy formulators must advance the technical regulatory framework. Blockchain technology can be effectively implemented only if the top management is committed to it because they can only frame the rules and right control framework, affirm the governance process and strategize improvement.Originality/valueThe study offers insights into the organization's decision makers for effectively implementing blockchain into their HR systems. Some specific recommendations based on the results are also made. The paper is an innovative attempt to analyse the barriers to HR blockchain.

[1]  S. A. Ganaie,et al.  The scientific outcome in the domain of grey literature: bibliometric mapping and visualisation using the R-bibliometrix package and the VOSviewer , 2022, Library Hi Tech.

[2]  Yudi Fernando,et al.  Adoption of blockchain technology to improve Halal supply chain performance and competitiveness , 2022, Journal of Islamic Marketing.

[3]  C. Tiwari,et al.  Using blockchain for global governance: past, present and future , 2022, South Asian Journal of Business Studies.

[4]  A. Barve,et al.  Blockchain technology: a catalyst for reverse logistics of the automobile industry , 2022, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment.

[5]  K. Salah,et al.  Integrating Lean Six Sigma with blockchain technology for quality management – a scoping review of current trends and future prospects , 2022, The TQM Journal.

[6]  S. Barua,et al.  Factors affecting blockchain adoption in apparel supply chains: does sustainability-oriented supplier development play a moderating role? , 2022, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[7]  G. Sureshchandar Quality 4.0 – understanding the criticality of the dimensions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique , 2022, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

[8]  Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke,et al.  A principal component analysis of barriers to the implementation of blockchain technology in the South African built environment , 2022, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.

[9]  Sanjay Dhingra,et al.  Blockchain technology adoption in government organizations: a systematic literature review , 2022, Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing.

[10]  André M. Carvalho,et al.  Quality 4.0: literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality , 2021, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

[11]  Mehmood A. Chadhar,et al.  Factors Affecting the Organizational Adoption of Blockchain Technology: Extending the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) Framework in the Australian Context , 2021, Sustainability.

[12]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Blockchain for development: a guiding framework , 2021, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[13]  Y. Gajpal,et al.  Determinants of Blockchain Technology Adoption in Supply Chains by Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in India , 2021, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

[14]  Maral Sotoudehnia ‘Making blockchain real’: regulatory discourses of blockchains as a smart, civic service , 2021, Regional Studies.

[15]  S. Prakash,et al.  Investigation and assessment of blockchain technology adoption in the pharmaceutical supply chain , 2021 .

[16]  M. Venkatesan,et al.  Blockchain in human resource management of organizations: an empirical assessment to gauge HR and non-HR perspective , 2021 .

[17]  Yi Mu,et al.  Scalable and redactable blockchain with update and anonymity , 2021, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Nripendra P. Rana,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of blockchain technology in business supply chains: a total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) approach , 2021, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[19]  J. Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers , 2021, International Journal of Production Economics.

[20]  Mohammad Rokibul Kabir,et al.  Behavioural intention to adopt blockchain for a transparent and effective taxing system , 2020 .

[21]  Vikas Kumar,et al.  A machine learning based approach for predicting blockchain adoption in supply Chain , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[22]  Albara W. Awajan,et al.  Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an empirical study of the factors affecting user adoption/acceptance , 2020, Cluster Computing.

[23]  S. Dutta Future Opportunities and Challenges , 2020 .

[24]  P. Bradford,et al.  A Framework to Evaluate Blockchain Use-Cases , 2020 .

[25]  E. Gökalp,et al.  Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Management: Understanding the Determinants of Adoption in the Context of Organizations , 2020, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[26]  Nitin Gaur Blockchain challenges in adoption , 2020, Managerial Finance.

[27]  Anchal Patil,et al.  Critical Success Factors for Blockchain Technology Adoption in Freight Transportation Using Fuzzy ANP-Modified TISM Approach , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[28]  Vipul Jain,et al.  Fuzzy DEMATEL analysis of barriers to Blockchain-based life cycle assessment in China , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[29]  Hong Phuc Nguyen,et al.  An integrated approach of ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier selection , 2020, International Journal of Procurement Management.

[30]  S. Grima,et al.  A STEEP framework analysis of the key factors impacting the use of blockchain technology in the insurance industry , 2020, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice.

[31]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[32]  A. Oke,et al.  Improving resilience of cities through smart city drivers , 2020, Construction Economics and Building.

[33]  Zhong Xu,et al.  What can blockchain do and cannot do? , 2020 .

[34]  Gunjan Soni,et al.  Adoption of blockchain in supply chain: an analysis of influencing factors , 2020, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[35]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Unearthing the determinants of Blockchain adoption in supply chain management , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[36]  Aruna Gawade,et al.  Validity and Integrity check in Supply Chain Management using Blockchain , 2020 .

[37]  S. Fosso Wamba,et al.  The impact of blockchain adoption on competitive performance: the mediating role of process and relational innovation , 2019, Logistique & Management.

[38]  Miguel R. Olivas-Lujan Blockchains 2019 in e-HRM: Hit or Hype? , 2019, HRM 4.0 For Human-Centered Organizations.

[39]  Rohit Gupta,et al.  Analysis of barriers to implement blockchain in industry and service sectors , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[40]  Trevor Clohessy,et al.  Investigating the influence of organizational factors on blockchain adoption , 2019, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[41]  R. Shankar,et al.  Decarbonizing freight transportation: An integrated EFA-TISM approach to model enablers of dedicated freight corridors , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[42]  Samuel Fosso Wamba,et al.  Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[43]  Julian Dibbell,et al.  Blockchain for business , 2019, Journal of Investment Compliance.

[44]  Sachin S. Kamble,et al.  Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains , 2019, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[45]  K. Plangger,et al.  It’s real, trust me! Establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain , 2019, Business Horizons.

[46]  Weidong Shi,et al.  Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[47]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Blockchain Adoption in Supply Chain Networks in Asia , 2019, IT Professional.

[48]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[49]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey , 2018, Int. J. Web Grid Serv..

[50]  Yang Lu,et al.  Blockchain and the related issues: a review of current research topics , 2018, Journal of Management Analytics.

[51]  Dianne Hall,et al.  Understanding the Factors Affecting the Organizational Adoption of Big Data , 2018, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Li Da Xu,et al.  Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[53]  Mostafa Adeli Zadeh,et al.  The Development of a Cleaner Production Model and Applied Management Solutions for the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2018 .

[54]  JaeShup Oh,et al.  A case study on business model innovations using Blockchain: focusing on financial institutions , 2017 .

[55]  M Balaji,et al.  Modeling the causes of food wastage in Indian perishable food supply chain , 2016 .

[56]  Sushil,et al.  Modeling enablers of TQM to improve airline performance , 2013 .

[57]  Sushil,et al.  Cognitive bias in salespersons in specialty drug selling of pharmaceutical industry , 2012 .

[58]  Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model , 2012 .

[59]  Hans-Christian Pfohl,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks , 2011 .

[60]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective , 2011 .

[61]  J. Watada,et al.  Decision Making With an Interpretive Structural Modeling Method Using a DNA-Based Algorithm , 2009, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[62]  Huan Neng Chiu,et al.  Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[63]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India , 2008 .

[64]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Creating flex-lean-agile value chain by outsourcing: An ISM-based interventional roadmap , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[65]  S. Arunachalam,et al.  Analysis and selection of green suppliers using interpretative structural modelling and analytic hierarchy process , 2008 .

[66]  R. Shankar,et al.  Modeling agility of supply chain , 2007 .

[67]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  A Strategy for Managing Customer-oriented Product Design , 2006, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[68]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[69]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[70]  Pisal Yenradee,et al.  Implementation sequence of engineering and management techniques for enhancing the effectiveness of production and inventory control system , 2000 .

[71]  Sushil,et al.  The objectives of waste management in India: A futures inquiry , 1995 .

[72]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[73]  James V. Hansen,et al.  ISMS: Computer-Aided Analysis for Design of Decision-Support Systems , 1979 .

[74]  D. W. Malone,et al.  An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[75]  H. Akhter,et al.  Blockchain Implementation Challenges in Developing Countries: An evidence-based systematic review and bibliometric analysis , 2022 .

[76]  José María de Fuentes,et al.  Achieving cybersecurity in blockchain-based systems: A survey , 2021, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[77]  Maria P. Michaelides,et al.  The Challenges of AI and Blockchain on HR Recruiting Practices , 2018 .

[78]  Florian Glaser,et al.  Introduction to Blockchain , 2016 .

[79]  Jeffrey P. Baker,et al.  The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework , 2012 .

[80]  J. Schermerhorn Management for Productivity , 1984 .