Trajectory of Improvement in Myelopathic Symptoms From 3 to 12 Months Following Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive disease resulting from cervical cord compression. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) is commonly used to grade myelopathic symptoms, but its persistent postoperative improvement has not been previously explored. OBJECTIVE To utilize the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) to evaluate the trajectory of outcomes in those operatively treated for DCM. METHODS This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. The QOD was queried for patients undergoing elective surgery for DCM. Patients were divided into mild (≥14), moderate (9-13), or severe (<9) categories for their baseline severity of myelopathic symptoms (mJOA scores). A parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model was fitted with 2 points improvement on mJOA from 3- to 12-mo follow-up as the outcome of interest. RESULTS A total of 2156 patients who underwent elective surgery for DCM and had complete 3- and 12-mo follow-up were included in our analysis. Patients improved significantly from baseline to 3-mo on their mJOA scores, regardless of their baseline mJOA severity. After adjusting for the relevant preoperative characteristics, the baseline mJOA categories had significant impact on outcome of whether a patient keeps improving in mJOA score from 3 to 12 mo postsurgery. Patient with severe mJOA score at baseline had a higher likelihood of improvement in their myelopathic symptoms, compared to patients with mild mJOA score in. CONCLUSION Most patients achieve improvement on a shorter follow-up; however, patients with severe symptoms keep on improving until after a longer follow-up. Preoperative identification of such patients helps the clinician settling realistic expectations for each follow-up timepoint.

[1]  Jefferson R. Wilson,et al.  Predicting the minimum clinically important difference in patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy. , 2016, Neurosurgical focus.

[2]  M. Fehlings,et al.  The Association of Cervical Spine Alignment with Neurologic Recovery in a Prospective Cohort of Patients with Surgical Myelopathy: Analysis of a Series of 124 Cases. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[3]  M. Fehlings,et al.  The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy , 2015, Spine.

[4]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis , 2015, Spine.

[5]  Zhiyu Zhou,et al.  Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[6]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[7]  R. Bartels,et al.  Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[8]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2015, Spine.

[9]  K. Freund,et al.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgical trial: randomized, controlled trial design and rationale. , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[10]  M. Fehlings,et al.  A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[13]  X. Liu,et al.  Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[14]  L. Holly,et al.  Surgical outcomes of elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2008, Surgical neurology.

[15]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Clinical and MRI Predictors of Outcome After Surgical Intervention for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2007, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[16]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[17]  F. Harrell,et al.  The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[18]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  The Impact of Standing Regional Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Outcomes in Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery. , 2012, Neurosurgery.