An Integrated Systems Approach to Explanation-Based Conceptual Change

Understanding conceptual change is an important problem in modeling human cognition and in making integrated AI systems that can learn autonomously. This paper describes a model of explanation-based conceptual change, integrating sketch understanding, analogical processing, qualitative models, truth-maintenance, and heuristic-based reasoning within the Companions cognitive architecture. Sketch understanding is used to automatically encode stimuli in the form of comic strips. Qualitative models and conceptual quantities are constructed for new phenomena via analogical reasoning and heuristics. Truth-maintenance is used to integrate conceptual and episodic knowledge into explanations, and heuristics are used to modify existing conceptual knowledge in order to produce better explanations. We simulate the learning and revision of the concept of force, testing the concepts learned via a questionnaire of sketches given to students, showing that our model follows a similar learning trajectory.

[1]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why we’re so smart , 2003 .

[2]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Learning Naïve Physics Models and Misconceptions , 2009 .

[3]  Ljupco Todorovski.  Inductive Process Modeling , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[4]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Learning physical domains: Toward a theoretical framework: Volume II , 1986 .

[5]  M. F. Wiser,et al.  When heat and temperature were one , 2014 .

[6]  John J. Clement,et al.  The Role of Thought Experiments in Science and Science Learning , 2012 .

[7]  Kenneth D. Forbus.  Qualitative Process Theory , 1984, Artificial Intelligence.

[8]  Sago Deroski,et al.  Discovering Dynamics: From Inductive Logic Programming To Machine Discovery , 2002 .

[9]  Sidney Strauss.  Ontogeny, Phylogeny, and Historical Development: , 1988 .

[10]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  P. Langley,et al.  Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation , 1990 .

[13]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[14]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Building Problem Solvers , 1993 .

[15]  C. Boyle,et al.  Studying conceptual change in learning physics , 1992 .

[16]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Automatic Abduction of Qualitative Models , 1992, AAAI.

[17]  Brian Falkenhainer.  A Unified Approach to Explanation and Theory Formation , 2003 .

[18]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Learners' (mis)understanding of important and difficult concepts: a challenge to smart machines in education , 2001 .

[19]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[21]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Companion Cognitive Systems: Design Goals and Lessons Learned So Far , 2009, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[22]  A. Ram.  Creative Conceptual Change , 1993 .

[23]  G. Sullivan,et al.  Heat and temperature. , 2022, BJA education.

[24]  John R. Anderson,et al.  MACHINE LEARNING An Artificial Intelligence Approach , 2009 .