Discrimination of opposite directions measured with stroboscopically illuminated random-dot patterns.

The aim of the present experiments was to investigate the maximum displacement over which coherent motion can be perceived (Dmax) for a stroboscopically illuminated moving random-dot pattern, both as a function of the size of the pattern and as a function of the spatial-frequency content. Perception of coherent motion was defined operationally as the ability to discriminate opposite directions. The maximum velocity (Vmax) for which the observer could discriminate the direction of motion for a given strobe rate was obtained by using a forced-choice staircase procedure. Vmax was measured as a function of the strobe rate for four different sizes of the pattern. For each pattern size Vmax was limited by the spatial asynchrony between the flashes (Dmax). For a given size of the pattern, Dmax did not depend on the temporal asynchronies tested (10-100 msec). Dmax values were increased with the size of the pattern. Bandpass rectangular filtering was used to change the spatial-frequency content of the pattern. There was a gradual increase in Dmax as the spatial-frequency content shifted to low spatial frequencies. Interestingly, the Dmax that was obtained with the unfiltered pattern was larger than that obtained with the high-pass pattern but also smaller than that obtained with the low-pass pattern. The present results are in agreement with results obtained with a two-frame display. Dmax is not a fixed value: it depends on the size of the pattern as well on the spatial-frequency content.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[3]  G. Westheimer Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus. , 1954, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Global Grouping Overrides Point-to-Point Disparities , 1976, Perception.

[5]  S. McKee,et al.  Sequential recruitment in the discrimination of velocity. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  O J Braddick,et al.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  B. Julesz,et al.  Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[9]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control—II. Single target displacements , 1979, Vision Research.

[10]  B. Julesz,et al.  Displacement limits, directional anisotropy and direction versus form discrimination in random-dot cinematograms , 1983, Vision Research.

[11]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  Responses of cat visual cortical cells to continuously and stroboscopically illuminated moving light slits compared , 1984, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Steinman,et al.  The smallest voluntary saccade: implications for fixation. , 1973, Vision research.

[13]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. II. Spatiotemporal range of directional interactions in MT and V1. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[15]  J. T. Petersik,et al.  Failure to find an absolute retinal limit of a putative short-range process in apparent motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[16]  J Duysens,et al.  The velocity dependence of direction selectivity of visual cortical neurones in the cat. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Motion capture anisotropy , 1987, Vision Research.

[18]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[20]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of the upper displacement limit for motion in random dots , 1984, Vision Research.

[21]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981 .

[22]  G. Orban,et al.  Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns , 1988, Vision Research.

[23]  A Pantle,et al.  Discontinuity limits for the generation of visual motion aftereffects with sine- and square-wave gratings. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  G Sperling,et al.  Three theories of stroboscopic motion detection. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[25]  C. Baker,et al.  The basis of area and dot number effects in random dot motion perception , 1982, Vision Research.