Head motion during cone-beam computed tomography: Analysis of frequency and influence on image quality

Purpose Image artifacts caused by patient motion cause problems in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) because they lead to distortion of the 3-dimensional reconstruction. This prospective study was performed to quantify patient movement during CBCT acquisition and its influence on image quality. Materials and Methods In total, 412 patients receiving CBCT imaging were equipped with a wireless head sensor system that detected inertial, gyroscopic, and magnetometric movements with 6 dimensions of freedom. The type and amplitude of movements during CBCT acquisition were evaluated and image quality was rated in 7 different anatomical regions of interest. For continuous variables, significance was calculated using the Student t-test. A linear regression model was applied to identify associations of the type and extent of motion with image quality scores. Kappa statistics were used to assess intra- and inter-rater agreement. Chi-square testing was used to analyze the impact of age and sex on head movement. Results All CBCT images were acquired in a 10-month period. In 24% of the investigations, movement was recorded (acceleration: >0.10 [m/s2]; angular velocity: >0.018 [°/s]). In all examined regions of interest, head motion during CBCT acquisition resulted in significant impairment of image quality (P<0.001). Movement in the horizontal and vertical axes was most relevant for image quality (R2>0.7). Conclusion Relevant head motions during CBCT imaging were frequently detected, leading to image quality loss and potentially impairing diagnosis and therapy planning. The presented data illustrate the need for digital correction algorithms and hardware to minimize motion artefacts in CBCT imaging.

[1]  K Horner,et al.  Dental CBCT equipment and performance issues. , 2013, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  Francisco Haiter-Neto,et al.  Impact of movement and motion-artefact correction on image quality and interpretability in CBCT units with aligned and lateral-offset detectors. , 2019, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  David Sarrut,et al.  An image‐based method to synchronize cone‐beam CT and optical surface tracking , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[4]  Ann Wenzel,et al.  Patient movement and motion artefacts in cone beam computed tomography of the dentomaxillofacial region: a systematic literature review. , 2016, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[5]  Ann Wenzel,et al.  An ex vivo study of automated motion artefact correction and the impact on cone beam CT image quality and interpretability. , 2018, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  Claudia Borri,et al.  Metal and motion artifacts by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental and maxillofacial study , 2015, La radiologia medica.

[7]  R. C. Fontenele,et al.  Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts. , 2018, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[8]  K Donaldson,et al.  Dental cone beam CT image quality possibly reduced by patient movement. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  A. Farman,et al.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. , 2006, Journal.

[11]  Ulrich Schwanecke,et al.  Automated detection of patient movement during a CBCT scan based on the projection data. , 2015, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[12]  A Wenzel,et al.  Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[13]  Reza R. Adhami,et al.  A head motion measurement system suitable for 3D cone-beam tomography using markers , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  R. C. Fontenele,et al.  Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images? , 2020, Imaging science in dentistry.

[15]  C. Gray Practice-Based Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Review , 2010, Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners.

[16]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  A Wenzel,et al.  Radiographic observers' ability to recognize patient movement during cone beam CT. , 2014, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  Bernard Koong,et al.  Cone beam imaging: is this the ultimate imaging modality? , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  R Schulze,et al.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[20]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[21]  Matteo Bettuzzi,et al.  Relevance of head motion in dental cone-beam CT scanner images depending on patient positioning , 2008, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[22]  L. Calistri,et al.  Repetition of Examination Due to Motion Artifacts in Horizontal Cone Beam CT: Comparison among Three Different Kinds of Head Support , 2017, Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry.

[23]  D. Viswanath,et al.  Application of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , 2013, Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology.

[24]  Tomáš Hanzelka,et al.  Reduction of the negative influence of patient motion on quality of CBCT scan. , 2010, Medical hypotheses.

[25]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Patient movement characteristics and the impact on CBCT image quality and interpretability. , 2018, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[26]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography examination. , 2015, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[27]  J. Nervina Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics. , 2012, Australian dental journal.

[28]  R. C. Fontenele,et al.  Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current , 2020, Imaging science in dentistry.

[29]  S. Mukherji,et al.  Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 1: Physical Principles , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[30]  Jin-Hyoung Cho,et al.  Influence of Head Motion on the Accuracy of 3D Reconstruction with Cone-Beam CT: Landmark Identification Errors in Maxillofacial Surface Model , 2016, PloS one.

[31]  Jaroslav Dusek,et al.  Movement of the patient and the cone beam computed tomography scanner: objectives and possible solutions. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[32]  A. Farman,et al.  Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. , 2012, Australian dental journal.

[33]  S. Mukherji,et al.  Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[34]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Movement characteristics in young patients and the impact on CBCT image quality. , 2016, Dento maxillo facial radiology.