Building a Model of Technology Preference: The Case of Channel Choices

Intention theories, such as the Theory of Reasoned Action, the Theory of Planned Behavior, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), have been widely adopted to explain information system usage. These theories, however, do not explicitly consider the availability of alternative systems that users may have access to and may have a preference for. Recent calls for advancing knowledge in technology acceptance have included the examination of selection among competing channels and extending the investigation beyond adoption of a single technology. In this study, we provide a theoretical extension to the TAM by integrating preferential decision knowledge to its constructs. The concept of Attitude-Based Preference and Attribute-Based Preference are introduced to produce a new intention model, namely the Model of Technology Preference (MTP). MTP was validated in the context of alternative behaviors in adopting two service channels: one a technology-based online store and the other a traditional brick-and-mortar store. A sample of 320 responses was used to run a structural equation model. Empirical results show that MTP is a powerful predictor of alternative behaviors. Furthermore, in the context of service channel selection, incorporating preferential decision knowledge into intention models can be used to develop successful business strategies.

[1]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  E-satisfaction: an initial examination , 2000 .

[4]  Iain S Fraser.  Unfair comparison , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[6]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Coupon Usage , 1984 .

[7]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Where To Go From Here? Thoughts on Future Directions for Research on Individual-Level Technology Adoption with a Focus on Decision Making , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[8]  Pratibha A. Dabholkar,et al.  Incorporating Choice into an Attitudinal Framework: Analyzing Models of Mental Comparison Processes , 1994 .

[9]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Turning Visitors into Customers: A Usability-Centric Perspective on Purchase Behavior in Electronic Channels , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[11]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[16]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The Internet Shopper , 1999 .

[17]  H. J. Einhorn.  Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information , 1971 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  Guilherme D. Pires,et al.  Influences on the perceived risk of purchasing online , 2004 .

[20]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies , 1977 .

[22]  I. Simonson,et al.  Attribute–Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals: , 1997 .

[23]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[24]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Yoram Wind,et al.  Multiattribute decisions in marketing : a measurement approach , 1973 .

[26]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[27]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies , 2005 .

[28]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[29]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[30]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces , 1997 .

[31]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces , 1991, MIS Q..

[33]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioral trust. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[35]  R. Bagozzi.  Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. , 1981 .

[36]  F. Kardes,et al.  The Role of Direction of Comparison, Attribute-Based Processing, and Attitude-Based Processing in Consumer Preference , 1999 .

[37]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Implications of researcher assumptions about perceived relative advantage and compatibility , 2008, DATB.

[38]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  A. Raub.  CORRELATES OF COMPUTER ANXIETY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS , 1981 .

[40]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Consumer acceptance of virtual stores: a theoretical model and critical success factors for virtual stores , 2004, DATB.

[41]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[42]  T. R. Stewart,et al.  10 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY , 1975 .

[43]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[44]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  James Jaccard,et al.  Atttudes and behavior: Implications of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives , 1981 .

[46]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[47]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[48]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors , 2002 .

[49]  Peter D. Bennett,et al.  Consumer and industrial buying behavior , 1978 .

[50]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet , 1998, CACM.

[51]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[52]  Bryan Gibson,et al.  The role of attribute knowledge and overall evaluations in comparative judgment , 1991 .

[53]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Psychological Contract Violation in Online Marketplaces: Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderating Role , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Prediction of goal directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control , 1986 .

[55]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach , 1982 .

[56]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[57]  J. Jacoby.  Consumer Psychology: An Octennium , 1976 .

[58]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[59]  M. Meuter,et al.  Intentions to Use Self-Service Technologies: A Confluence of Multiple Attitudes , 2003 .

[60]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  The impact of online store environment cues on purchase intention: Trust and perceived risk as a mediator , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[61]  Michael D. Johnson.  Consumer Similarity Judgments: A Test of the Contrast Model , 1986 .

[62]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[63]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[64]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[65]  Bryan Lilly,et al.  An Exploratory Examination of Retaliatory Preannouncing , 2000 .

[66]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[67]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes , 1994 .

[69]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[70]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  On risk, convenience, and Internet shopping behavior , 2000, CACM.

[71]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  THEORY OF REASONED ACTION , 2014 .

[72]  P. A. Dabholkar.  Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality , 1996 .

[73]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[74]  Jeffrey E. Danes,et al.  Social Judgment Theory , 1984 .

[75]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis , 1980 .

[76]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters , 2000 .

[77]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  TORKZADEH AND DHILLON Measuring Factors that Influence the Success of Internet , 2015 .

[78]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[79]  Marcel Creemers,et al.  Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[80]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[81]  David J. Reibstein,et al.  The Prediction of Individual Probabilities of Brand Choice , 1978 .

[82]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Impact of Customer Trust and Perception of Security Control on the Acceptance of Electronic Commerce , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[83]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[84]  C. Whan Park,et al.  The Effect of Individual and Situation-Related Factors on Consumer Selection of Judgmental Models , 1976 .

[85]  B. Byrne.  Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[86]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[87]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the World Wide Web , 1996, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[88]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods , 1983 .

[89]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[90]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Consumer Choice Behavior in Online and Traditional Supermarkets: The Effects of Brand Name, Price, , 2000 .

[91]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[92]  Al Farooq M. N. Salam,et al.  Three essays on electronic commerce: www information content, internet involvement and perceived risk , 1998 .

[93]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  From Prediction to Explanation: Reconceptualizing and Extending the Perceived Characteristics of Innovating , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[94]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations , 2007 .

[95]  Cynthia M. Jackson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System , 1997 .

[96]  James Jaccard,et al.  Attitudes and behavior: An information integration perspective , 1985 .

[97]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[98]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[99]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[100]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review , 1979 .

[101]  P. Bentler.  Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models , 1990 .

[102]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..