Thematic role focusing by participle inflections: evidence from conceptual combination.

The authors examined how people integrate knowledge of agents and patients of events with the temporal and causal properties of present and past participles to constrain interpretation of isolated participle-noun phrases like arresting cop and arrested crook. Good-agent head nouns were more easily combined with present participles (e.g., arresting cop) than with past participles (e.g., arrested cop), and the reverse was true for good patients. Furthermore, present-participle good-patient phrases (e.g., serving customer) were often interpreted as verb phrases. This research provides further evidence of the interaction between morphosyntactic cues and world knowledge of events in language comprehension.

[1]  R. Lees.  The grammar of English nominalizations , 1960 .

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[3]  Judith N. Levi,et al.  The syntax and semantics of complex nominals , 1978 .

[4]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  Understanding noun phrases , 1979 .

[5]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Maintaining Organization in a Dynamic Long-Term Memory , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[8]  Daniel G. Morrow.  Grammatical Morphemes and Conceptual Structure in Discourse Processing , 1986 .

[9]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Comprehending Complex Concepts , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. , 1988 .

[11]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference , 1988, CL.

[12]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination , 1990 .

[14]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[15]  G. Murphy,et al.  Feature Availability in Conceptual Combination , 1992 .

[16]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[17]  Talmy Givón,et al.  Coherence in text, coherence in mind , 1993 .

[18]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .

[19]  Barbara A. Fox,et al.  Voice : form and function , 1994 .

[20]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[21]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[22]  David Caplan,et al.  Interaction of verb selectional restrictions, noun animacy and syntactic form in sentence processing , 1994 .

[23]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Passive Participles across Languages , 1994 .

[24]  T. Givon.  8. Coming to terms with cognition: Coherence in text vs. Coherence in mind , 1995 .

[25]  T. Givón,et al.  Coherence in spontaneous text , 1995 .

[26]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[27]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  E. Wisniewski.  Construal and Similarity in Conceptual Combination , 1996 .

[29]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Influence of discourse context on feature availability in conceptual combination , 1996 .

[30]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Multiple organisations of events in memory. , 1997, Memory.

[31]  E. Wisniewski.  When concepts combine , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Todd R. Ferretti,et al.  Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts , 1997 .

[33]  N Carriedo,et al.  The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .

[35]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[36]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[38]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study , 1998 .

[39]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[40]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Relation-Based Combinations Versus Property-Based Combinations: A Test of the CARIN Theory and the Dual-Process Theory of Conceptual Combination , 2000 .

[41]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Verb Aspect and Situation Models , 2000 .

[42]  J. Oberlander,et al.  Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations , 2000 .

[43]  K. McRae,et al.  Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts , 2001 .

[44]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.