Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.

The anti-scatter grid has been widely used to reject scatter and increase the perceptibility of a low-contrast object in chest radiography; however, it also attenuated the primary x-rays, resulting in a substantial loss of information and an increased relative noise level in heavily attenuated regions. A more dose efficient approach to scatter rejection is the slot-scan imaging technique. Another problem in chest radiography is the low transmitted x-ray intensity in heavily attenuating regions. It results in a higher relative noise level, thus limiting the contrast sensitivity. A solution to this problem is through the exposure equalization technique, with which the incident x-ray intensity is regionally modulated to compensate for the differences of x-ray attenuation due to the anatomic variation. We are in the process of implementing the scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR) technique, which combines the advantages of slot-scan imaging and exposure equalization. However, associated with the use of exposure equalization is a redistribution of scattered radiation at the detector, which may impact on the benefit of using exposure equalization in conjunction with the slot-scan imaging geometry. In order to understand the scatter properties and their impact in SEDR, we have used spot collimated digital radiographic images to synthesize simulated SEDR images with which scatter components, primary signals, and scatter-to-primary ratios (SPRs) were measured. It was shown that the anti-scatter grid rejected approximately 70% and 80% of scattered radiation in lightly and heavily attenuated regions, respectively, while the slot-scan method can reject as high as 95% (with 1 cm slot width) of scattered radiation without attenuation of the primary x-rays. Using a simple model for scatter effects, we have also estimated and compared the contrast-to-noise ratio degradation factors (CNRDFs, i.e., the fraction by which CNR is reduced). It was found that for quantum limited situations, the slot-scan technique has resulted in a substantial improvement of the image quality, as indicated by higher estimated CNRDFs (less scatter). An estimated improvement of 40%-50% in the lungs, 50%-90% in the mediastinum, and 60%-110% in the subdiaphragm was achieved with the slot-scan over the anti-scatter grid method. Compared to slot-scan imaging, SEDR resulted in higher SPRs in the lungs and lower SPRs in the mediastinum. In the subdiaphragmatic regions, the SPRs remain about the same. This corresponds to lower CNRDFs in the lungs, higher CNRDFs in the mediastinum, and about the same CNRDFs in the subdiaphragmatic regions. It was shown that although SEDR has resulted in minimum improvement over slot-scan imaging in reducing the SPRs, it could improve the contrast sensitivity by raising the primary signal levels in heavily attenuating regions. This advantage needs to be further investigated in our continuing study of the SEDR technique.

[1]  J. Sorenson,et al.  Rotating disk device for slit radiography of the chest. , 1980, Radiology.

[2]  D B Plewes,et al.  A scanning system for chest radiography with regional exposure control: practical implementation. , 1983, Medical physics.

[3]  Hiroaki Yasuda,et al.  Improvement of image quality in CR mammography by detection of emissions from dual sides of an imaging plate , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[4]  K Doi,et al.  Physical characteristics of scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology: Monte Carlo simulation studies. , 1985, Medical physics.

[5]  James A. Sorenson,et al.  Scattered radiation in chest radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[6]  D B Plewes,et al.  A scanning system for chest radiography with regional exposure control: theoretical considerations. , 1983, Medical physics.

[7]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" x-ray flat-panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for general radiography systems , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Xinming Liu,et al.  An alternate line erasure and readout (ALER) method for implementing slot-scan imaging technique with a flat-panel detector-initial experiences , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  C A Mistretta,et al.  Digital beam attenuator technique for compensated chest radiography. , 1986, Radiology.

[10]  C. Vyborny,et al.  Foil filters for equalized chest radiography. , 1984, Radiology.

[11]  C E Ravin,et al.  Technical evaluation of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector. , 1995, Radiology.

[12]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[13]  D Gur,et al.  Effectiveness of Antiscatter Grids in Digital Radiography: A Phantom Study , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[14]  L J Kool,et al.  AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography. , 1988, Radiology.

[15]  J A Sorenson,et al.  Scatter rejection by air gaps: an empirical model. , 1985, Medical physics.

[16]  A Fenster,et al.  A time-delay integration charge-coupled device camera for slot-scanned digital radiography. , 1990, Medical physics.

[17]  W. Veldkamp,et al.  Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study. , 2005, Radiology.

[18]  K Doi,et al.  Optical image processing with liquid-crystal display for image intensifier/television systems. , 1988, Medical physics.

[19]  R E Latchaw,et al.  Diode array digital radiography: initial clinical experience. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  G T Barnes,et al.  Contrast and scatter in x-ray imaging. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  J. Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results. , 2000, Medical physics.

[22]  W Herstel,et al.  Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study. , 1988, Radiology.

[23]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[24]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems. , 2005, Radiology.

[25]  C E Ravin,et al.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  C E Ravin,et al.  Measurement of scatter fractions in clinical bedside radiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[27]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  A slot-scanned photodiode-array/CCD hybrid detector for digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[28]  Albert de Roos,et al.  Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom. , 2004, Radiology.

[29]  K L Lam,et al.  Effects of x-ray beam equalization on mammographic imaging. , 1990, Medical physics.

[30]  J Duryea,et al.  Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system. , 1995, Radiology.

[31]  T Mather,et al.  Area x-ray beam equalization for digital angiography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[32]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system. , 2004, Medical physics.

[33]  G T Barnes,et al.  Scanning slit chest radiography: a practical and efficient scatter control design. , 1994, Radiology.

[34]  G. Iinuma,et al.  Diagnosis of gastric cancers: comparison of conventional radiography and digital radiography with a 4 million-pixel charge-coupled device. , 2000, Radiology.

[35]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology. , 1995, Medical physics.

[36]  E W Webster,et al.  Radiographic contrast improvement by means of slit radiography. , 1975, Radiology.

[37]  H. Blume,et al.  DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. , 1995, Medical physics.

[38]  Xinming Liu,et al.  A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement. , 2004, Medical physics.

[39]  C E Ravin,et al.  Scatter fractions in AMBER imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[40]  J A Seibert,et al.  An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography. , 2000, Medical physics.

[41]  J. Boone,et al.  Evaluation of x-ray scatter properties in a dedicated cone-beam breast CT scanner. , 2005, Medical physics.

[42]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system. , 2000, Medical physics.

[43]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Improved imaging performance of a 14"x17" direct radiography system using a Se/TFT detector , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[44]  R A Kruger,et al.  Scatter rejection by electronic collimation. , 1986, Medical physics.

[45]  W Huda,et al.  Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography. , 1998, Medical physics.

[46]  D. Plewes,et al.  Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography. , 1988, Radiology.

[47]  U Neitzel,et al.  Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation. , 1992, Medical physics.

[48]  S Rudin,et al.  Improved contrast in special procedures using a rotating aperture wheel (RAW) device. , 1980, Radiology.

[49]  Thorsten Graeve,et al.  High-resolution CMOS imaging detector , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[50]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Evaluation of a CMOS image detector for low-cost and power medical x-ray imaging applications , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[51]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[52]  J M Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation. , 2000, Medical physics.

[53]  E. Samei,et al.  Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems. , 1999, Medical physics.

[54]  A computer‐controlled x‐ray imaging scanner using a kinestatic charge detector , 1990 .