Patterns of Governance among Inter-organizational Coordination Hubs

We focus on the governance of inter-organizational coordination hubs (ICH). We do so to advance conceptual and empirical insights about ICH governance. We are motivated by the simple observation that, increasingly, organizations are engaging in shared activities, often relying on a purpose-built digital infrastructure to support collaboration among organizations. Here we use the conceptualization of network governance to guide our analysis of characteristics of governance that distinguish low and high performing ICH. To do this we use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis and data from 61 public safety networks (PSN) – a particular form of ICH. The analysis shows there exist six distinct configurations of PSN governance practices that lead to high performance. Common to all these configurations is competence in managing both stakeholders and the digital infrastructure. Building from the findings, we advance the role of specific competencies and network governance more broadly.

[1]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Through a Glass Clearly: Standards, Architecture, and Process Transparency in Global Supply Chains , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  From Artefacts to Infrastructures , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[3]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Acklesh Prasad,et al.  On governance structures for the cloud computing services and assessing their effectiveness , 2014, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Janet Chan,et al.  The Technological Game: , 2001 .

[6]  Dag Ingvar Jacobsen,et al.  The impact of governing networks - the role of context, organizing and trust , 2012 .

[7]  Arun Rai,et al.  Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Max Stephenson,et al.  Managing networks as learning organizations in the public sector , 2012 .

[9]  Pericles Loucopoulos,et al.  Quality evaluation framework (QEF): Modeling and evaluating quality of business processes , 2014, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[10]  L. Bertalanffy General Systems Theory , 2016 .

[11]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[12]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Governance Structures in Cross-Boundary Information Sharing: Lessons from State and Local Criminal Justice Initiatives , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[13]  Naim Kapucu,et al.  The State of Network Research in Public Administration , 2017 .

[14]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Going Concerns: The Governance of Interorganizational Coordination Hubs , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  K. Provan,et al.  Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness , 2007 .

[16]  Julie Baldwin,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2016, Journal of mixed methods research.

[17]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[18]  W. Staples Policing Contingencies , 2004 .

[19]  Charles C. Ragin 1 From Fuzzy Sets to Crisp Truth Tables , 2005 .

[20]  J. Fedorowicz,et al.  Rational choice and institutional factors underpinning state‐level interagency collaboration initiatives , 2012 .

[21]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Information Technology Implementers' Responses to User Resistance: Nature and Effects , 2012, MIS Q..

[22]  Angsana A. Techatassanasoontorn,et al.  Exploring Qualitative Comparative Analysis in IS Research , 2013, PACIS 2013.

[23]  Guido Schryen,et al.  Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Implementing Cross-Agency Collaboration: A Guide for Federal Managers with Dr. Jane Fountain , 2013 .

[25]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[26]  Axel Marx,et al.  The origins, development, and application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: the first 25 years , 2013, European Political Science Review.

[27]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Mechanisms of Control in Emergent Interorganizational Networks , 2012 .

[28]  Angelika Zimmermann,et al.  Vicious and virtuous circles of offshoring attitudes and relational behaviours. A configurational study of German IT developers , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution , 2013, MIS Q..

[30]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Governing IT in inter-organizational relationships: Issues and future research , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Terence Dunworth,et al.  Information Technology and the Criminal Justice System: An Historical Overview , 2005 .

[32]  D. Dillman,et al.  Mail and telephone surveys , 1978 .

[33]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Designing electronic government information access programs: a holistic approach , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Acklesh Prasad,et al.  On Governing Collaborative Information Technology (IT): A Relational Perspective , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[37]  Robin Williams,et al.  e-Infrastructures: How Do We Know and Understand Them? Strategic Ethnography and the Biography of Artefacts , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[38]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Design matters for decision makers: Discovering IT investment alternatives , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[40]  Jane Fedorowicz,et al.  A collaborative network for first responders: Lessons from the CapWIN case , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical , 2009, Inf. Polity.

[42]  Nelson E. King,et al.  Exploring the impact of operating model choice on the governance of inter-organizational workflow: the U.S. e-prescribing network , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Robin H. Lemaire,et al.  Core concepts and key ideas for understanding public sector organizational networks: Using research to inform scholarship and practice , 2012 .

[44]  Wei Li,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[45]  Jane Fedorowicz,et al.  The formation of inter-organizational information sharing networks in public safety: Cartographic insights on rational choice and institutional explanations , 2009, Inf. Polity.

[46]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .

[47]  Patrick A. Mello Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2014 .

[48]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Governing the Hollow State , 2000 .

[49]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[50]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage , 2006, Political Analysis.

[51]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Discovering the Multifaceted Roles of Information Technologies with a Holistic Configurational Theory Approach , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[52]  Xiaotong Li,et al.  International Journal of Information Management the Role of the Quality of Shared Information in Interorganizational Systems Use , 2022 .